🔵 The Saturn Connection

Have you ever wondered why the planets were named after God's despite merely  being little pin-pricks of light that we could not even differentiate from stars? Why were the lives of ancient peoples governed by these astronomical observation phenomena that were apparently of utterly no consequence to their daily lives and rendered  imperceptible compared to the sun and moon? Or were they really as I have just described?

   Above: The diefication of planets. In almost all ancient       myth and religion the planets were not merely      representative of the gods, they were the gods!

What is the true source of the global archetype myth that was part of a little known culture whose mythology or perhaps even real experiences were arguably the genesis (or at least influencer) of all the better known and more familiar ancient mythology? Better answers surely lie in a synthesis between the latest science and the oldest myths rather that the prevailing insistence on making them mutually exclusive.

The one bit of emergent science that needs to be taken seriously to fully appreciate what I'm about to present to you is the electrodynamic centred understanding of cosmology rather than just working with the old "gravity only" paradigm. I say this particularly  because the electric sun is relevant, a model (where low energy fusion happens more as transmutation in the photosphere) and why I propose its superior to the thermonuclear fusion model (where high energy fusion happens in the core.)

Myth:

Below: There was a time when all rock art represented a very different looking sun compared to how its been depicted in the last 1000 years (If it was even the sun at all)

Is there a possibility that our ancestors saw a different sun?

Here are some known problems with the notion of a solar system not being interfered with (in any fundamental way) for 4.5 billion years. It has an unusual profile which does not match any of the 1000s of exoplanet systems observed to date. Nearly all exoplanetary systems we discover are all vastly different, it seems we are unique in many ways. 

Here below is some good speculation surrounding this potential scenario which is much more interesting yet still actually  scientifically MORE plausible and makes sense of mythology as well as accounting for our unusual, non-binary solar system and its lack of a "Hot Jupiter" . 

Plasma formations and notions of a primordial sun (below)

That is not to say that plausibility is evidence per se, although this understanding I'm putting forward here for consideration has both circumstantial and specific hard evidence in spades when compared to the prevailing hypothesis, which basically doesn't have ANY.  I understand that last sentence is predicated on a bold claim. I understand the implications of such a claim. 

The current reconstruction (it must be remembered that it's just a reconstruction) is basically just an educated guess. That's fine obviously, what other options do we have? BUT, now consider that such a guess is getting old and is one which emerged from now falsified astronomical assumptions. 

How plausible is the conventional wisdom? 

I propose It should actually be described as unlikely or barely plausible. In all of its underpinnings, none are confirmed by observation since being first speculated. Even the latest telescopes just keep increasing the conflicts between theory and observation.  

All LAMBDA CDM principles (the cosmology model that sets the parameters for theoretical principles our solar systems origins are framed by) are falling apart over time going right back to the Big Bang. 

As a sidenote please consider the fact that our "Standard Model" has a monopoly on public funding. It relegates global mythology to child-like fantasy and treats the improbable uniformity in their global structures and themes as pure chance.

Science:

This post represents one possible stunning conclusion to two previous posts. Its notable conclusion is that all of the natural disasters associated with the post are related to a possible disassociation with our original brown dwarf star, the star Proto-Saturn, and assimilation into our orbit with the sun, or alternatively some relationship along those lines.

There can be no certainties but I'll make a case (or two) suggesting that such a scenario is a more complete circumstantial case than the unlikely accepted and established scenario. Four billion 500 million years of totally uninterrupted gradualism thinking is possible, but is it plausible? 

No. A plausible case over that time frame would involve thousands of cataclysm scale events that flavour each stellar system. Understanding what these events were entirely is a fool's errand, but understanding events, even relatively minor ones, in the last few hundred thousand years may be attainable despite the fact that they occurred before written history..

..or did they?

 Post on rethinking our history of civilization.  

Here is the post

And the other post is a tutorial of sorts which I put together to succinctly cover all the most basic aspects of the science required to consider this a better understanding of the history of our solar system and a means of setting  a context for explaining historical anomalies through s version of human history that better assimilates the problems arising from the improbable timeline of the established story.
Here is that post

_______

Let's get to it.

There is credible evidence to suggest we were one of Saturn's moons. This has has been proposed in many guises from David Talbots Saturn myth, later refined in collaboration with the Thunderbolts Project. Many variations of this hypothesis are currently energing, each with interesting angles I suggest you give a chance.

To dismiss this out of hand in light of all the evidence presented here (and in the two given links to previous posts) is in my view very unscientific. Nobody can claim to have the settled story of our solar system, and I would be very skeptical of anyone who makes such a claim.

Let me go over some aspects of this hypothesis 

The Polar Configuration. 

A) Gravitational capture. When a captured system enters a system of stronger gravitational or electromagnetic force. 

Comet Schumacher-Levy 9 stretched to a  formation as the described "polar configuration"  looked as it approached Jupiter. Saturns satelites would have behaved similarly as it approached the sun. 

B) Electrodynamics. Herbig Harow objects. In the electric sun model which is gaining favour and supported by all observation to date (No observation as yet has ever been made supporting the accretion disc model which also does not work on computer model) the star Proto-Saturn would form immediately following the sun, and on capture not exceed escape velocity. Saturn would flicker out being dominated by the suns electrical environment and only a salty water residue, probably a shower of water raining down on its satelites such as earth, explaining its oceans and identical chemical composition which is such a mystery right now. When forming ice it would become a ring system on the equator, which is exactly what Saturn has. 

C) Other possibilities like this exist such as the Expanding Earth Hypothesis. The addition of so much water as well as changes to the earths ionized plasma charge environment of a brown dwarf changing to the more exposed emptier space Goldilocks zone of the sun may have effects on our planets size and gravity. This is initially quite "out there" sounding but the fact that the continents fit perfectly when the earth is 60% size is compelling, and its often pointed out, correctly, that a billion years of Continental Drift by the the current plate tectonic model would ensure that there is no recognizable relationship between continents. They would never fit together if this was the case or even bear a vague relationship, they would be entirely randomly shaped. 

These, and many more seldom heard hypotheses, are all possibilities which only seem contraversial because we are trained to see an unlikely model, where for 4.8 billion years no real disturbances other than the formation of our moon, and the delivery of our water, and the craters of every moon in the solar system happen by ad hoc seperate events. The scenarios above actually could apart, or in combination explain all those events in a much more believable way. The orbital chaos could have lasted a thousand years or millions of years, easily accounting for extinctions and the anomalies of myth and legend, depending on when they happened. They also answer roundly ignored puzzles like the impossible size of dinosaurs and that is just the ones I have mentioned. 

If you think we fully understand gravity, think again:

( link for direct YouTube play is https://youtu.be/OTMELHUAzSM )

Gravity grey areas

🔵 Plasma Cosmology, The Electric Universe & The Thunderbolts Project - Difference/ Background/ Basic Tutorials (Pt 1)

Plasma Cosmology:  

Modern Plasma Cosmology has evolved from but is inspired by what was once known as the "Plasma Universe" It puts forward that gravity is not the dominant force in the universe, and that electrodynamic forces are as important or more important (depending on the order of magnitude).  It is centered around a connected universe where charge separation is prevalent, but its scope and focus remain rooted in astronomy including Cosmology and Astrophysics. Not every Plasma Cosmology devotee has the same position, but it generally retains the thermonuclear core star principle from the Standard Model despite radically different views on star formation.

Electric Universe Paradigm:

Uses the principles above in all astronomical matters but goes further by invoking the Electric Sun Model, which has a variety of possibilities rooted in self-contained plasma magnetic entities, double-layers and arc discharge anode-cathode heliosphere principles that will be explained later on.  The EU paradigm goes significantly further by making the case that the principles defining Plasma Cosmology must therefore be in play in fields such as Geology, Archaeology, Biology, Weather and more since the plasma state of matter is the state we find in over 99℅ of the matter in existence. The Electric Universe highlights how an "overall universal charge" is not needed.  Neither is a "source for all the electrons". This is simply because of the clear and pervasive influence of many forms of charge separation on all scales.  That means the principles should apply broadly throughout our reality since this would be an inescapable logical consequence of the laws of Classical Physics.

The Thunderbolts Project: 

TBP is one movement within the EU community, without doubt the leading influencer.  It goes further yet in scope by reinvestigation of historical events through the EU prism. TBP introduces the potent angle of a spirit of cross disciplinary co-operation as an antidote to the over specialisation that we see in science today. Thunderbolts is also known for its novel view of placing value in the vast libraries of resources available to researchers in ancient mythology. This becomes valuable not by subjective speculation but by using a system where the archetypes of global myths are extracted, and it follows logically that the common themes must regarded as a source of historical value commensurate with how widely proliferated they are, especially when understood through Electric Universe principles.

NB: Foreword

If you are like me, someone with a keen interest all things science, you may feel a certain degree of resistance to these ideas after so much exposure to the science of "Big-Bang" cosmology (The LAMBDA-CDM concordance model) and all the spin that comes with it.  I would urge you to overcome those feelings if your sense of certainty gives you the need to dismiss this science out of hand.  That would be an unfortunate error in judgement that will cost you a rich source of the most elegant and powerfully predictive science currently available.

If you are indeed willing to open your mind to these findings you will open yourself up to the extraordinary explanatory powers of Plasma Cosmology and The Electric Universe. At this point a remarkable thing happens: 

You will find that most of the dead ends in the space sciences will suddenly seem like new horizons.  

Pay no mind to those "debunking" videos on YouTube or other mainstream platforms.  I will get to why they are so weak.  Better still, I will place you in a position to have enough of a grasp of the fundamentals that you will not take them seriously and may even be able start spotting the agendas behind the attacks.  Usually, they are out of a sense of feeling threatened. Unbeknown to some this is actually an extremely well backed up set of disciplines experimentally and is not as much at the mercy of the musings of the more theoretical physics as the standard model is, nor to the projections or modelling mathmagicians (in cases where they conflict with observations) either. As with anything, it's not immune to errors or hypotheses and has a healthy appetite for reviewing its own body of work. It's vital to keep in mind at all times that The Electric Universe now has many voices and no one voice speaks on behalf of all. It encourages speculation but always seems perfectly clear on the boundary of where there are proven principles based on such fundamentals as Maxwells equations and alternatively when there is speculating.  Compared to Theoretical Physics of standard models it speculates in increments instead of compounding layers of assumption on top of each other creating a house of cards. Such speculation is very sensible and as such it is very healthy.  

However:

What you will not find...

You will not find speculation that "reality is a two-dimensional hologram projected onto the surface of a three-dimensional sphere" here.  Nothing real exists in two dimensions, it boggles the mind that String Theorists could overlook that obvious fact!  Neither will you learn that reality exists in eleven or more spatial dimensions as the mathematics of trendy theoretical physics requires. 

This is because there are only three spatial dimensions.  A "dimension" in mathematics merely represents a degree of freedom and should never substitute for real world representation, relatability, ability to communicate in principle what concept means and most importantly the one thing modern astrophysics repeatedly ask you to disregard in a form of brainwashing.  That thing is common sense.  Place value in it. 

Observation must be explainable in cause/ effect terms as was always done in classical physics. These should all be self-evident, and it goes without saying that they are all critical aspects of what the new cosmology must be.  I am here to tell you that this is possible, it's already been achieved!  There are very important consequences. In this regard you will not find that over 80% of the universe is mysterious invisible "dark matter" here, or that (together with the equally fantastical "dark energy") almost all of the universe has turned out to be "missing".

What are the main space sciences?

Astronomy is the broad strokes science of all celestial bodies., planets, moons etc in the night sky. It's involved with the physics somewhat, but also mapping, charting, practical application of telescope and observatory resources and incorporates under it both Astrophysics & Cosmology.  The institutions under the current establishment do not teach competing hypotheses and despite heavy competition for funding interally it must be said that overall the status quo has the monopoly on public funding and the public understanding of science.

Astrophysics involves itself principally with the actual physics involved with these bodies. It's become increasingly mathematically reliant and as an example it would attempt to deal with the problematic physics of the thermonuclear fusion model of the sun, or the infinities laden black hole physics as well as interface with such things as String Theory etc. Cosmology is tasked with the ultimate quest. The big picture questions. What is the origin and fate of the universe. Should we persist with the failing LAMBDA-CDM standard cosmological model or look at contenders to the throne such as Plasma Cosmology. Despite an overlap with Astrophysics, it is Cosmology that will ultimately be discipline that we use as our arena for questions beyond the overall model, such as:

• Was there a big bang?
• How old is the universe?
• What are space and time? 
• How many dimensions are they set in?
• What is the Cosmic Web? 
• What is the origin of comets etc.
• What is "embedded space" and is it a consequence of or setting for space and time?

Its Cosmology that was once referred to as the "queen of the sciences".

And may I cordially welcome you to the rabbit hole! 

 An introduction to the Electric Universe by the founders of The Thunderbolts Project. 

 Getting a sense of the current landscape in Astronomy, Cosmology and Astrophysics:  

Below: The nature of the current insurgency, why it's so critical it must happen, and a succinct overview of the sun's electrical environment. The embedded clip below includes a quick overview of how exactly it works. This is an important fundamental aspect of understanding what is to follow. 

NB* Watch me! 

An overview of Plasma Cosmology is HERE

Urgent: "We only have 12 years left before we extend the deadline to a later date!" Climate Scientists

Global warming became "climate change" and word on the street is that "climate fiasco" or "climate farce" is the front-runner for the next rebrand.

WORLD—Climate experts have solemnly warned that we only have twelve years left until they change the dates on globalwarming again. (Continued below link)

https://www.thegwpf.com/english-summer-failing-to-meet-alarmist-expectations/?fbclid=IwAR3M-9kakGMxfcmACciUWnnnwVIAp91W-9ZtLKFy7ahjASKukdYfGYy43lo

"If we don't take action, then in 12 years we will have to explain why the world hasn't ended and come up with a new number," one UN scientist warned. "This is a very serious threat, and we urge everyone to hand control of the economy to the government immediately before we have no more time left to change the timeline again."

Climate scientists can't predict what will happen next year, but we trust them to predict 12 or 30 years ahead? That's why this complete and utter failure happened happened!   (Link)

The scientific consensus is that roughly 10-12 years from now, the world will be flooded with new doomsday predictions. This can all be avoided if we overhaul the economy and become socialists, according to non-political, unbiased sciencey type guys.

"Should we not change our ways, our old predictions will melt, dangerously raising the chance of us having to move the goalposts again," said Al Gore. "Do you really want me to write another book, film another movie, and go on another tour in my private jet just because you dingbats couldn't be bothered to alter your lifestyles? I don't think so. Let's all get on board with this 12-year figure, or we'll have to push back the date again." 

Keep reading at the link below

https://babylonbee.com/news/experts-warn-we-have-only-12-years-left-until-they-change-the-dates-on-global-warming-again?fbclid=IwAR0jGlodhnUuLBw3683e9ADC4TfYewFP2PHKdjuzIv-wINrPY21IjOgJL9g

More climate change satire? 

Click here

⏪ A stunning revision of the past which could be as unbelievable as any science fiction blockbuster (Part 1)

INTRODUCTION 

The requirement of a frame of reference.

"What if the defining catastrophe of the human part of world history has no observable equivalent occurrences today? Surely, we would entirely leave it out of our picture?"

According to Wikipedia, which represents the establishment view of most matters, the substance and starting point of our history is as follows:

Quote

"The history of the world, in common parlance, is the history of humanity (or human history), as determined from archaeology, anthropology, genetics, linguistics, and other disciplines; and, for periods since the invention of writing, from recorded history and from secondary sources and studies.

Humanity's written history was preceded by its prehistory, beginning with the Palaeolithic Era ("Early Stone Age"), followed by the Neolithic Era ("New Stone Age"). The Neolithic saw the Agricultural Revolution begin, between 8000 and 5000 BCE, in the Near East's Fertile Crescent. During this period, humans began the systematic husbandry of plants and animals.^[2] As agriculture advanced, most humans transitioned from a nomadic to a settled lifestyle as farmers in permanent settlements. The relative security and increased productivity provided by farming allowed communities to expand into increasingly larger units, fostered by advances in transportation."

End Quote

I don't think the untouchable status the above synopsis once had is given as much credence as it once had.  At the very least it would be fair to say it has lost its reverence. Academics and professionals (and amateurs for that matter) have found various anomalies which don't allow for the established view to stand up to scrutiny.  We may not have a specific nomination of a single "for certain" replacement theory but this is a very exciting time in the landscape. I'd like to give what I consider the leading contenders are for the disruption of the narrative. The clues about our real history.  They all come together in surprisingly supportive ways, although those telling these stories may not really fully understand this themselves.

Download the delightful and fascinating book  "Maps Of The Ancient Sea Kings: HERE

(I chose a link where you can view first before downloading because default downloads of large docs annoy me too)

What new evidence is at odds with current thinking?

The reason I have dedicated two full posts just to give the briefest possible outline of slow collapse of the narrative is because there is not one "slam-dunk" reason for it.  Much of the challenge is emerging from fresh thinking emerging out of the information era and sharing of ideas occurring a bit more outside of prevailing structures these days. Always reserve judgement and keep an open mind.  Be mindful of the tendency that the status quo has become ossified and reacts defensively in those instances where points of contention are raised by scientists, academics and engineers from outside of the structures of anthropology, archeology, Egyptology and conventional ancient history.  Even more so when amateurs, authors or journalists contest the prevailing story, and the challenges are never addressed or become lost in a sea of ad hominem attacks usually playing the man and not the ball.  This happens even in cases involving the most well-evidenced or well-made cases.  That is why it is vital that you do not get drawn in by such an approach.  It stems from a political mindset of individual agendas of no interest to you and I.  If you are curious about the subject matter as I am you will surely agree that the quest for an objective perspective can only be nurtured by the decision to always and only focus on the caliber and academic fortitude of whichever case is being subjected to scrutiny. 

1) Clandestine Cover Ups

We all enjoy scandal and intrigue. Conspiracy (especially ancient conspiracy) is interesting.   While there are surely and surprisingly many of these controversies in play, we must not lose perspective.  The damage done by those seeking to protect past interests have done incalculable damage to our ability to fully understand our own past.  This involves a cast of characters to broad to mention but just to give a sense of the problem it's worth noting how diverse they are in range.  From the Jesuits whose agenda is impossible to fully assess, to colonial agendas, the Catholic Church at the height of its power and even the ideologically motivated seemingly sober minded monks that rewrote so many historical texts (often by first destroying the original source documents).  Don't think of it as artifact of past power structures, I assure you it happens even today and is no less prevalent.  Players like ARCE and the Smithsonian immediately spring to mind with their endless mischief while they enjoy unquestioned admiration from institutions of the prevailing establishment.  That being said, these cover-ups still represent the minority of "things that don't add up" in ancient history, since so many things don't add up. Just ask any regular tour guide in Egypt and you will hear about how boring old history is surrounded by more drama, lying and politics than the US Department of State.

I think a good place to start would first be a quick mention of the corruption inherent in the protection of the standard narrative. There are a variety of motives and so many examples that in order to avoid that theme hijacking this post I have decided to make it the subject of its own upcoming post. Scandal is always interesting.  To give a few clues as to the scale of the known deceit and regular cover up going on, where Egyptology (very relevant here) is a serial worst offender. This tip off sent into a known YouTube channel is a great example out of many known to plague the field. I will focus on academic examples in my upcoming post, I've chosen an example that demonstrates that open-source contributions can be made by anyone willing to travel that is willing to wander from the beaten path. To save time (if you are in a hurry) skip the intro of this particular example and track to 5.20 .

The above example is an easy to post example of what I mean, but in reality these examples are everywhere. To see what I mean listen to the background discussion in most of the clips I include in this post, the reason I always add multimedia is that it can give an expanded sense of the atmosphere. There are often grumbles of secret digs, sealed off corridor's or missing archaeological artefact's and physical evidence that mysteriously goes missing, without the expected investigation following it.

2) Standard political or commercial cover-ups. 

Another form of cover up involves less mysterious motives and usually involves the prosaic fact that archeological digs take up lots of time and involve the zoning of land. That is to say that the prospect of land going to commercial or industrial interests for development starts to appear being out of the question. Either that or in some similar way interferes with some or other special interest group or government.  The below example involving the cover up of the great Labyrinth of Egypt.  This famous site is of no less historical status and reputation than the Pyramids on the Giza Plateau themselves and just like the Great Pyramid was part of the super prestigious list of wonders of the ancient world.  How could anyone believe that such a find was discovered and then covered up by Egypt's own government?  Believe it!  In fact, that site never stood a chance, and the reason is just as clear and obvious as it is frustrating.

Ben van Kerkwyk explains how the construction of the Aswan Dam, a modern-day mega-engineering project in Egypt, caused a rise in the water table of several meters, making the prospect of a dig costing billions loom large for the authorities, a gamble they were not prepared to take and a decision they were not prepared to admit they made. 

3) Denial, consensus cover-ups, protecting monopolies on public funding, public understanding of science, careers, tenure & nepotism

There is no single citation that does this cover up justice because 90% of all cover ups likely fall into this category.  Most of the rest of the post as well as the follow up post, part 2, falls into this category.  Although, between you and I, deep down inside I harbor suspicion that a fair bit more actually falls into category 1 above. However, since I cannot prove such a thing, I cannot state it categorically.

South Africa: Land and Taxes Part 3: From the Reserve Bank to the president.

Because I'm so frustrated with the narrative of media coverage in SA, and the entire framing of issues in the minds of South Africans, I'm going to do a whole series of posts on Banks, Mines, The JSE, the bogus reasoning of all our political parties etc. I'll be attempting to completely reframe the way we think about things here in SA.

Do not believe the MSN that the ANC Government is fully in control of the nation, do not believe the "State Capture " MSM reports regarding former president Zuma. That is SA's "Russiagate" . Even though our central bank works differently,  which a limited dividend private sharhealing from the public domain to compliment the cabal control,  private shareholders have no say in policy, and despite media lies, the government is not in control of its mandate, and it has tried to influence the mandate only to be met with thinly veiled threats from the big capital interests to sink the Rand. 

Blue text is an active link. 

Just when I thought Rhamaphosa was coming right, three months after saying all the right things we are losing momentum again.  Bankster trained economists knee jerk reaction to nationalising the SARB is always the same, point to the Rand moving downwards on news (will always happen, but we need the appetite and courage to overcome little bumps if we deserve our sovereignty).  They will also point to "foreign investment" and the bankster run credit ratings agencies, the ones that rated all the junk stocks as Tripple ""AAA"" just before the 2008 crises.  All of these are strongarm tactics designed to maintain the globalist banker capture of our state, the real state capture.

Here he is getting it right 3 months ago:

But old habits die hard, and that inspiration seems to be fading, or he has once more been gotten to.

This article is about how the SARB, aided by commercial banks steals prosperity from us and our children whilst it transfers wealth from the common people, the taxpayers, to the global fat-cat elites (From whom Rhamaphosa professes to want to reclaim land, but in fact it works the other way around because home loans are not loaned from a capital or asset account but created by banks magically on their balance sheet and the new currency starts its life on the national balance sheet as debt owed by a citizen to a bank despite no loan occurring, yet there is somehow exorbitant interest attached to the "loan" and defaults are seized by the banks.  This is nothing more than wealth transfer.  We must not lose sight of the fact that ultimately its property and land that have value, not the paper fiat currency which is not backed by anything other than SARB inflationary overprinting and bank overlending) but in essence this method is used in all countries because the central bankers have control over the whole global currency system and use similar methods everywhere.  You cannot mine on anything but land, farm on anything but land, or live on anything but land.

Do not harbour under the illusions that "White Owned" or "Black Owned" political talking points have any bearing on our reality, now influenced more by globalization and colonial legacy far more than race-baiting political baiting.  The land issue can only be resolved after the Reserve bank is nationalised and the banks are reformed. But that is a global battle, not just a local, and we all know what happened to the last few countries who dared keep sovereign control of their central banks (I'll give you a clue, those countries were/are Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Somalia, and North Korea....)

Do not harbour under any illusions of SARB reform or Treasury reform is imminent.

Before reading this I suggest checking out my earlier articles on the SARB and money creation:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2015/11/exposing-south-african-reserve-bank.html
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/04/the-sa-reserve-bank-67-tons-of-rands-on.html
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/04/money-printing-for-dummies.html

Governments can never repay the national debt, this is by design, and must always pay for civil and other services by DEFICIT SPENDING (meaning borrowing the money from private banks like the SARB)  If the government could simply issue its own currency, there would be no steadily increasing national debt, and a balancing the budget without deficit spending would become a priority with a sound money Austrian Economics approach rather than a Globalist Keynesian approach. However, since we (or our government on our behalf) borrow from private banksters who act as brokers for bondholders, a fractional reserve style, liquidity gearing national debt is created and the majority of all our tax we pay every month goes to servicing the interest portion of the national debt and paying the banksters.  Let's be clear on that, our tax pays the banks. Because money is borrowed at interest there is never enough to service the principle "debt" and money must always be borrowed for this purpose. Only the interest is serviced and the principle is never resolved, that is the goal. As far as the mechanics of this chicanery is concerned, this is done by issuing treasury bonds sold to the "Primary Dealers" (International bankster cabal like the usual suspect Rothschilds; Rockefellers as well as those same interests behind JP Morgan Deutsche Bank, Investec ; Citi) as well as SA's big four banks who are also owned in part by the banksters who own the SARB by a similar system of shareholder arrangements that evolved over time by mergers and acquisitions. Only a small portion of public shareholders have Reserve bank shares and shareholder arrangments centre this control out of germany.

The Bonds are auctioned off every second Friday in South Africa:
https://www.jse.co.za/trade/debt-market/bonds/government-bonds
https://wwwrs.resbank.co.za/mcm/showcontrib.aspx?category=BA

And there are a few scant reports in the media about certain aspects of this corruption, but a poor understanding of a public primed to focus on other issues by the media means no real interest in the most important issue facing all of us every day, the hidden theft of most of our money.
http://mg.co.za/article/2012-01-13-jse-tackles-primary-dealers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_dealer

These primary dealers make a "Secondary Market" (IE make a further profit off us by privileged of the mandate of first creating money with interest to turn us into debt slaves servicing our national debt with tax, then selling the bonds at profit in a secondary market.

Once this happens the bonds ensure all debt by the future taxation of a nation's children to service the interest for the international banksters. That's why Government Bonds are such secure investments, they are guaranteed by taxation of the public. We are the surety, our blood sweat and tears insure their profit.  Because of technology, the inflation (hidden taxation and savings destroyer) that is eroding our standard of living, compensates for the productivity deficit that builds, but one salary is no longer enough and soon we will have to co-habitat because we will not be able to have families afford their own homes as money loses it's purchasing power.

This would all stop if we had taxpayer oversight instead of an "Independent" SARB, based on real money, a store of VALUE instead of fiat currency which is created from DEBT.  Fiat currency and Keynesian chicanery are how the banksters pull the wool over our eyes, and since CODESA the government are mere administrators, those that truly control our economy will never give it up because those are the people that destroy entire countries to bring their central banks under their control. They would likewise sooner destroy the country (or than return it to the citizens. Their MO is divide and conquer, so they would more likely get that country to destroy itself, and South Africa is rife with potential divisions to exploit.  It;s safe to say that Rhamaphosa will not take meaningful action against the SARB, and his nepotism is no better than Zuma's, but concerns should go beyond that, (relatively little attention has been paid to the fact that the Total discovery of a gas field south off Mossel Bay – which Ramaphosa and Gwede Mantashe expressed delight about, stands to benefit just one South African individual, businessman Phutuma Nhleko, to the tune of potentially hundreds of billions) and more.  Concerns should go beyond his being a member of the board at Lonmin (London Mining SA) and Marikana, beyond his time at MTM and McDonalds.  It should also look beyond his joint venture with coal cabal Glencore and the costly coal price weighing so heavily on South Africans for electricity generation and beyond the two decades he spent immersing himself in the world of capital finance, a world far from the base and much closer to the controlling Bank interests of the South African Reserve, who are the same interests behind the climate change behind the scenes restructuring of our economy at the cost to the people, and the same people whose renewable energy plans and climate change cabal fixing of the coal price have caused massive operational cost hikes in Eskom, all loosely aligned to form the real group who have no plans to give land back to South Africans, despite what the President says.  Those people may be laundered in with local JSE fatcats or corporate entities, but ultimately those are offshore interests, such as behind the banks, Anglo, farms/vineyards/paper forest plantations or our energy reserves which will not benefit the people but rather fall victim to nepotism or bankster cronyism, just like our money supply.

These interests are laughing at us, because while they and their ilk have a long history of this, their insiders like Trevor Manual the Rothschild man, Tito Mbowemi the Goldman sacks man, Pravin Ghordan and Rhamaphosa himself will focus on "Land Reform" being a divide and conquer strategy along racial lines, and to keep the presidents perception problem with the black vote at bay, South Africans are too busy fighting among themselves demographically to spot the unseen hand operating the levers from afar.

This was a continuation of post:
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/06/south-africa-land-and-taxes-part-2.html

Ramaphosa backstory:

lesson 101

By

Mtho Sibiya Nge Khomo

Cyril Ramaphosa was recruited as a Spy from the Police Reservists in 1971 (his father was also an SAP).

His University fees were paid by Urban Foundation of the Oppenheimers. 

While he was in his 20s, the Transvaal Mining houses led by the Oppenheimers and the Menels, they made him the head of Africa's biggest union (founded by White mining bosses, the Rand Club): NUM. 

In 1990, Craig Williamson, the NIA spy who successfully infiltrated the ANC inserted Ramaphosa on the Mandela Welcoming/Reception Committee even though Ramaphosa was not a member of the ANC and was not known by UDF. 

Ramaphosa was entered into the ANC Elective Conference without Credentials (since he has joined the ANC that very year in 1991). 

Even though he was young and unknown, Ramaphosa won becoming the SG or main administrator of the ANC: effectively meaning the ANC was captured by the White Apartheid State through Ramaphosa. 

The Media suddenly claimed that he was Mandela's preferred successor (the same Media support he receives now).

In an old TV episode with Evita Bezeidenhod; Ramaphos is shown at a large farm with no explanation how he obtain the farm. 

Pro-Black parties such as the PAC, Azapo and BCM were killed off in favour of the captured ANC which Negotiated at CODESA on behalf of Black people with Ramaphosa as Chief Negotiator.

He delivered for White Apartheid beneficiaries by giving us a pro-White (Sunset Clauses) Canadian Constitution with European values and maintaining the Vestigates of Apartheid and colonial gain such as Land. 

Ramaphosa was awarded for his Double Agent work by being made a Billionaire. 

The ANC was pressured by Business to appoint Ramaphosa as Zuma's Deputy in order to attract business. 

When Zuma did do that; he was suddenly poisoned with the same GEM that killed Yasser Arafat. Zuma was saved by Russian doctors (and MaNtuli was blamed). 

Remember how the Rating Agencies and the Media was worked up to high Anti-Zuma hysteria which all died down when Ramaphosa took over

Homepage:     https://dwahts.blogspot.com

Globalist Coin? Would the Globalists use a cryptocurrency for their One-World-Currency?

Issuing digital Fiat Currency was always going to be the candidate for the famed "Öne-World-Currency" planned by the internationalist central banking "NWO" because typing ones and zeros onto your digital balance sheet by legal mandate was always going to be easier than printing physical money. But digital Fiat Currency is not a Cryptocurrency.  The only thing they have in common is being digital.  The globalist angle here is actually a cashless society to completely control the grid (meaning credit card transactions, payments, foreign exchange and bank accounts)  This way they shut out what used to be known free-market capitalism in the good old days, now known as the informal sector.  Such entrepreneurial enterprises outside of the centralised framework of banking, SWIFT, PAYPAL, and the bankster frameworks of foreign exchange and Visa/Mastercard accepted by all the retail monopolies, usually globalist retail companies by policy rather than ideology even if they are not multinationals because they are still corporate.  Crypro may shut out beggars for now but even though it's digital its decentralised and controlled by the people on a distributed network of peers via a blockchain rather than some standardised SAP system under centralised bankster administration.  This clip will demonstrate how Bitcoin is boosting the informal sector, particularly the dark web and the surprising conclusions.we can now come to.

The other important factor is that real crypto cannot be printed by some shadowy central cabal, by government or by corporations, it has to be mined.  This would collapse the economy where the banksters rely on QE money printing for their means of control, so digital currency and cryptocurrency have even less in common than most people think.

Here are my requirements for real crypto if you are interested.

The establishment oligarchs have taken gold and silver, peoples money, and issued our currency for us.  Their oligarchy establishment will only accept their currency and can turn you off from their grid under centralised control at any moment.  Without cash, you would be utterly lost in that situation.  With crypto, you could at least transact anonymously if you know the means and nobody can "switch you off".

This is the main reason why I will not go full socialist under corporate/govt administration as long as we are on a monetary system, although it does seem likely that some or other form of socialism may be needed for a long time yet for medical, pension, military, prisons and social services to keep the multinational globalist vultures away from the benefits that they are entitled to since it's their tax that funds it. Those that take a simple "pro" or änti" stance on capitalism lack imagination or don't understand that socialism can be used by malicious forces just as capitalist forces do on Wall Street today.  Capitalism is evolving away from the oligarchs to the people by the following means, slowly reintegrating into society":

Capitalism can be for the people or entrepreneurial even today, even though it's moving outside the formal sector, which the globalists would consider "The Establishment."

Examples:

• Cryptocurrency
• Street Vendors
• Some taxi drivers outside of globalist schemes like Uber
• The black market
• Smuggling 
• The Dark Web
• Stokvels
• Spazza Shops
• etc... basically anywhere where they don't take credit cards.

So why would the globalists want Crypto? I doubt it, but there are rumours that if Hashgraph is used instead of blockchain, which solves the Byzantine Generals problem of consensus, is not open source software, the crypto may not be decentralised, especially if they use pre-mined tokens, and all sorts of back-doors could exist for the globalists to move into, copyright or monopolise rather than destroy cryptocurrency.  They are already buying and gaming crypto, but this will never give them the control they need, they just influence the investment value.  Ultimately crypto is increasing in value due to scarcity whereas fiat is inflationary due to expanding the currency supply faster than goods and services, and deficit spending growing faster than GDP.

The fiat currency "One World Currency" would likely be digital, and follow a similar path that the Euro did with the globalist EU single currency zone, it would not be a cryptocurrency.  The IMF already has the prototype, the Special Drawing Right, known as the SDR, currently being made into a currency basket with the USD, Euro, Yuan, Ruble in preparation for phase-in after the IMF forecloses on the Fed, whenever that may be.

That being said, the following developments are interesting:

The above clip gives a thorough synopsis, but here are some contrasting takes from differently aligned sources:

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/05/facebook-cryptocurrency-coming-in-june-report.html

https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2019/06/06/facebook-globalcoin-cryptocurrency/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2019/06/06/facebooks-radical-bitcoin-beating-cryptocurrency-plans-revealed/#45bce3053564

Keep watching that space!

Having a free market of various cryptocurrencies has its benefits,  such as not having central bank monopoly of the money creation process and having them LOAN BACK our money to us as if it were theirs and afford bondholders investment opportunity with the nation's taxation as surety just to enable deficit spending, but there is a caveat.  One of the fundamental points of having a non-inflationary cryptocurrency is precisely because having only a fixed number of Bitcoins or whatever able to be mined, scarcity is ensured, but removing limits on the number of crypto's themselves defeats this purpose because even if the banksters are not creating the actual currency, the system can be gamed, so it will interesting to see how the community deals with this challenge.

New York Times invents fake climate history to match its fake geopolitical history.

Some vintage New York Times propaganda

The New York TImes.  One of Americas trusted names in media.  I certainly trust them, but let me clarify that statement. All their sports scores are accurate, and their telephone number and website address are correct usually,  They have a good spellcheck software option.  Sometimes their page numbers are correct, and their address perhaps. Anything else?"Perhaps their economic indicators are technically accurate, even if they are reported in a completely disingenuous context. Anything else?

Nope, nothing else is correct because they insist on filling their content with "News" and "Politics" and "Climate Change".....

....and let's face it....

They will never get any of that right, so my praise is limited to my opening paragraph which is a testament to nothing more than the staggering misplacement of trust I was referring to in my second sentence.

In the clip below from his YouTube channel, Tony Heller goes back in time and shows us how much hotter summer used to be in the States, but he uses a method that the NYT may not fully understand,  He goes by facts.  He then takes those facts and makes conclusions BASED ON THOSE SAME FACTS!

He could be onto something.  All I know is that if the fact-based reporting on politics, war or climate change ever catches on in the good old USA, all of their MSM is finished.

But let's be serious for a moment here. I am joking around of course, I don't really believe US media will really start reporting facts, not even a flat-earther would believe a wild conspiracy theory like that!