Google is no longer just towing the globalist line, it is actively pushing the establishment narrative on all the flashpoint issues where censorship is required and in all the regions where regime change is required.
Welcome to the Orwellian reality of Google's new hybrid think-tank/ Company JIGSAW.
According to establishment mouthpiece, Wikipedia, the sanitised blurb for Jigsaw is as follows:
Jigsaw, formerly Google Ideas, is a technology incubator created by Google, and now operated as a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. Based in New York City, Jigsaw is dedicated to understanding global challenges and applying technological solutions, from "countering extremism", online censorship and cyber-attacks, to protecting access to information.Wikipedia
Because I'm so frustrated with the narrative of media coverage in SA, and the entire framing of issues in the minds of South Africans, I'm going to do a whole series of posts on Banks, Mines, The JSE, the bogus reasoning of all our political parties etc. I'll be attempting to completely reframe the way we think about things here in SA. Blue text is an active link. The Issue of Climate Change has been shown (even on this blog alone ) to be a globalist construct and product of the dynastic legacy families of capital finance as well as think tanks from globalist and tax-exempt foundations. The objective is to seize control over sovereign energy policies and to drive up the price of energy commodities used in privatised or parastatal utility companies such as the Eskom price hikes experienced through hikes in the coal price (energy commodities other than the oil price that is, which is linked to the petrodollar faction of the US hegemonic globalist faction blooded through the CFR which is behind the oil wars, regime change, the US Department of State and the Pentagon). The globalist agenda via the UN is to use sustainability to implement the planned austerity (already rolled out in the globalist vipers den of the EU) and particularly the austerity of carbon swaps, carbon taxes and carbon credits in the post-carbon economy which is being marshalled so diligently at the various globalist climate conferences, the Bilderberg meetings and the PR handled by the ever faithful MSM. The science is flimsy at best and the data is regularly corrupted to fit the awful predictions made by the woeful models developed and used as evidence (not that models can EVER be called evidence). Simply put the science does not stand to scrutiny and this has been dealt with many times before in previous posts. If you do not accept this premise the impact of this particular post will be lost on you but I welcome any constructive engagement through the contact section of this blog or as a private message on Facebook or Twitter. Please focus on the specific point of disagreement to save me the time of repeatedly covering the same issues if I have not covered that issue in enough detail previously to persuade you. I only use a tiny fraction of the collection of reputable data sources, professional sources and media or organisational institutions as referenced links but have dozens more too detailed to use as quick verifications for citations on my posts. If you make a compelling case I assure you I will reply and cite you in amendments or corrections with thanks if you can clearly demonstrate an error or point out a reasoning flaw. Usually, the globalist cabal (for lack of a better word to describe this sort of colluding collective) has gotten to our government via the finance ministers post, usually via treasury or the SARB. The climate change agenda works differently and uses the IPCC as well as the UN as its supra-national enforcer of choice instead of the IMF or World Bank and ICC. It also has taken the trouble of establishing working committees and departments established in every government. In South Africa this is notably manifest as The Centre For Environmental Rights which will enforce laws and permit criteria which the Chamber of Commerce and Department of Trade and Industry will duly fall in line with. This will give them extra clout because since CODESA the capital finance "powers that be" only control the economy of SA but the Government are the lowly administrators but can still be a barrier to passing legislation, even when insiders like Rhamaphosa are Pravin Ghordan are in office. This way all legislated enforcing can be done using government agencies that have traditional taxpayer oversight, from the bureaucratic sector to even the police force and the courts, all are now going to have to police this these practices or they will be in the unenviable position of dereliction of duty if they refuse to enforce. We missed the boat by stopping this at the source, prior to legislation being passed. Rhamaphosa's latest cabinet features too many politicians from the post Zuma cabinet that are loyal to Rhamaphosa and possibly therefore his masters from the JSE or offshore to be sure about who will put the country first VS who will do us damage by following rich heritage of globalist traitors such as Tito Mbowemi, Trevor Manual and Pravin Ghordan but even if they don't the damage is already done.
Because I'm so frustrated with the narrative of media coverage in SA, and the entire framing of issues in the minds of South Africans, I'm going to do a whole series of posts on Banks, Mines, The JSE, the bogus reasoning of all our political parties etc. I'll be attempting to completely reframe the way we think about things here in SA. Blue text is an active link. Paper needs LAND and Paper products form an interesting discussion around tax. Most of SA's tax is from VAT, formerly GST as well as feul tax and levies as well as income tax. 1. VAT on textbooks is a form of capital generation by the government, although a book itself is a finished product, large capital flow goes into the beneficiation of paper from timber. 2. Paper is obviously still made from wood, JSE listed companies Sappi and Mondi Rotatrim, Typek all need vast tractions of land or deals with farmers or other related timber companies which often leads to deforestation (destroying the ecological base of South African fauna with plantations and monoculture) 3. Some of these companies lie and say they use coated, woodfree paper, whatever that means. It is a lie. 4. Universities and schools are amongst the largest consumers of paper and pulp products everywhere, possibly the biggest of them all. This ranges from books to textbooks, cardboard, pulp, toilet tissue etc. Brands like Twinsaver, Kleenex, Baby Soft are all branches of the large conglomerates involved in the paper and pulp making industry, which all use wood found on LAND as a raw material. USA, Great Britain, Canada, Sweden, Finland, Russia, Korea, China are amongst the scavengers of African forests for the paper and pulp industry. A very good case was recently made against VAT in textbooks, considering the above this is nowhere near enough! The issue should be further unpacked to look at plantation ownership rather than just "employment opportunities" offered since plantations take up over 1% of our total land, which is massive when you consider how much Karoo and highveld wilderness remains unused or undeveloped or protected.In terms of land use, the afforested area is about 1,27 million ha or about 1% of the total South African land area of 122,3 million ha. This opens a Pandora's box which I will get to in future posts.I have many reservations that any meaningful land reform will ever come from purely race-based politics which feed the divide and rule agenda, even though most of the land historically recently has been in "white" hands, by perpetuating the above nothing will change except some blacks will be empowered. However, this only applies if your idea of empowerment is the rich black CEO's, upper management and shareholders that South Africas "Employment Equity" laws guaranteed placement. This especially applies to these multinational companies and equally corrupt sub-contractors and vendors. In real-world terms, no opportunity exists on the land of the forefathers of the black majority for their descendants even years after the colonial rule was supposedly ended. Racial employment laws and other factors also are sending "previously advantaged" whites packing if the emigration stats are anything to go by. Racial issues exist as inextricably linked to land issues in South Africa but the local approach to them, just like everywhere in the world is divide and conquer/ divide and rule. If history teaches us anything (real history not fake history) is that we should not support top-down initiatives masking such tactics unless you are a ruling elite who would then benefit. Are you a ruler? Will you benefit? These multinationals own much of the land their plantations are on, rather than "White farmers" we are dealing with clever shareholder arrangments, JSE arrangments and political bureaucracy that leads to all the usual suspects. https://www.sappi.com/sappi-forests https://ejatlas.org/conflict/mondi-and-sappi-plantations-in-zululand-south-africa
https://fulldisclosure.cer.org.za/2015/paper-pulp/licences The issue is not just land but the paper itself and this extends to education. 1. SA Reserve Bank has a duty to regulate rates which determine prices at which goods are sold. 2. SARS has a duty to collect revenue from these monstrous Multi-National companies which manufacture paper. But how many billions does Sappi have offshore? which if were progressively taxed would fund the education of thousands of students? 3. The National Treasury, Finance Minister and SARS also have a duty in making sure that all textbook selling stores in South Africa don't engage in price fixing or hike the price due to opportunistic political development. After all, why should the students pay so much money while Multi-National companies, especially those profiting off our land, are allowed to shift profit to offshore havens without them declaring profits? If anyone wants their land back or at least reasonably priced back in the public domain for entrepreneurs and taxpayers rather than rebate thieving offshore multinationals, start with the paper industry and follow the path to free government education. Paper leads to business and education... but also to land and taxation. This is how to frame the issue in your mind. Now, what if I told you every other industry follows a similar path? Don't believe me? Stay tuned for upcoming posts on SA Land & Taxes for more of this As a side note on the education thread that I'd like to tie up, It is critical that the core syllabus never be handled in privatised capacity. This should always be a taxpayer-funded function that must be improved from that sphere rather than privatising. The reasons for this are clear and abandoning expectation for government improvements and allowing faceless, shadowy corporate agendas to steer the ship can only end in tears.
When I wrote this post: https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/12/american-people-buy-stuff-they-dont.html
I realise I left out some important information essential to a bigger understanding of how the manipulated economy works, which is of course much different to how it will be explained on Bloomberg, CNN / BBC Money /Biz or MSNBC. I focussed on exporting inflation but I entirely forgot to understand bubbles in the context of also being inflation. This is critical. It also supplements my post: https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/04/money-printing-for-dummies.html
Perfectly and would suggest reading both those posts before listening to the brilliant Mike Maloney in the following video which you must listen to in its entirety. I learn a lot from this man.
Other Posts I have done where I use Mike Maloney's input are as follows:
Most companies become successful thanks to their stellar reputations. But not always. RT Business scraped the bottom of the barrel to find the most hated companies trending on the internet.
Monsanto
The company that needs no introduction, creator of DDT and Agent Orange, Monsanto is one the world’s largest pesticide and GMO seed manufacturers. It is known for being the first company to genetically modify a seed to make it resistant to pesticides and herbicides. Monsanto’s herbicides have been blamed for killing millions of crop acres, while its chemicals were added to blacklists of products causing cancer and many other health problems.
Once the darling of Microsoft-hating gadget lovers, Apple more recently has been accused of mistreating or underpaying their employees, hiding money offshore, and not paying taxes. It has also been accused of violating health or environmental legislation, and misusing its position where they have a monopoly in the market. And, oh yes, deliberately slowing older iPhones and overcharging for its products to boot.
The world's largest food and beverage company Nestle says it is committed to enhancing quality of life and contributing to a healthier future. However, it has been dragged through numerous scandals involving slave labor. The multinational is one of the most boycotted corporations in the world, as violations of labor rights have been reported at its factories in different countries.
The products of the American multinational cigarette and tobacco manufacturing company are sold in over 180 countries outside the United States. Philip Morris owns Marlboro, one of the world's biggest brands. Back in 1999, Philip Morris courted officials of the Czech Republic by explaining how smoking would in fact help their economy, due to the reduced healthcare costs from its citizens dying early.
McDonald's
American fast-food company McDonald's was founded in 1940. The company serves more customers each day than the entire population of Great Britain, but has a long history of terrible labor practices. It has been constantly under fire for serving unhealthy junk food, which contributes health problems. Researchers have found that McDonald’s burgers cannot decompose on their own.
ExxonMobil is the world's largest oil corporation. It's the merged oil corporation of two of the thirty-four oil corporations that were broken up from the massive Rockefeller corporation, Standard Oil, in 1911. And, the Rockefellers retained large and small pieces of all of those oil corporations, including Exxon, Mobil, Chevron, AMOCO, Sunoco, Marathon, etc. John D Rockefeller is known to have been happier after the monopoly was broken up because he is thought to have done even better afterwards. At least this is what he has stated.
Interestingly, the main source of the criticism on Exxon's climate change policy is the Rockefeller Foundation who have strategically divested from oil in name only for PR purposes, but who still run the global Petrodollar war machine with other powerful cabal members from the globalist viper's nest centred around the United States Department of State. It appears that they are once more creating controversy in order to whip up political fervour in the voters in their usual "Divide and Rule" manner. The Rockefellers and their ilk have a long history of playing on both sides of every issue. If you have any doubt as to the scale and influence of the globalist order in these affairs, then consult this detailed breakdown of who they are and how they operate.
Let us not forget that it was The Rockefellers, after all, that supplied Hitler's Germany with oil from Venezuela, during WWII, through Vichy France. Legally. Hitler's invasion of Poland and France rolled forth on Rockefeller fuel in Ford trucks. US, British, and German bankers and industrialists invested in German industry after the First World War and financed the rise of Hitler, since 1925.
Prescott Bush's bank, UBC, in New York, bought Hitler his party headquarters. Bush lost his directorship at UBC for trading with the enemy, in 1942. But Bush continued to manufacture the gas that killed millions of Jews and other people, in Germany. The Rockefellers, Prescott Bush, GE, and IBM helped to build, run, and supply Auschwitz. They used concentration camp labour in their industry in Germany and Poland.
The Bushes and Rockefellers financed and advised every US President since WWII, besides Kennedy and Trump. They financed Hitler and then they financed Eisenhower, in 1952. Ike's running mate, Richard Nixon, had been Prescott Bush's man in Congress since WWII. Bush mentored Nixon so closely in 1952 that they dressed identically.
The Rockefellers have been controlling our perception of oil from the outset. Prepare to fall off your chair..
The Rockefeller banks, Chase and Citi, and the Rothschilds Bank of America, and also Wells Fargo, are the Big Four Banks. They financed both Obama and McCain,back in 2008. They financed both Hillary and Jeb Bush, in 2016. Obama's adviser on wars in eight nations, to control the flow of all of the world's oil, was Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was David Rockefeller's right-hand man, and who used the CIA to arm Muslim extremists in the Middle East, since the Carter administration.
The Big Four Banks control US foreign policy (wars) by financing the campaigns of Presidents and most members of Congress, Democrat or moderate Republican. The religious right Tea Party politicians are financed by the Koch brothers, who are Rockefeller Establishment splitters.
The Globalization of Banking
The globalization of big oil, banking and media preceded all the other mergers and acquisitions or share buybacks we see so prominently today. All three are pivotal in the climate change movement. On the face of that alone if one's suspicions are not already aroused one should never seek a career as a private investigator, detective or investigative journalist of any sort because one would not appear to have the intuition for it.
The Big Four Banks orchestrate their influence over most members of Congress, the corporate news media, and the Bush/Rockefeller created and run CIA, through their private organization, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
We Should be very wary of the lingo and jargon the think tanks have already prepared for us going forward. None of it is sincere and all of it is designed with a political goal in mind. The Rockefeller Establishment bankers have made defacto admissions to using the climate change issue to whip up fervour among voters (to get out the vote for Democrats and moderate Republicans who will support their wars for control of the flow of all of the oil in the world.) They have used the issues of abortion and gun control for the same purpose, for decades, even though nothing much ever changes on those issues. Because, it would require a Supreme Court ruling to change Roe v Wade, and a Constitutional Convention to change the Second Amendment.
We are being played by the Rockefeller Establishment, through their media, to get us riled up about what Exxon said about climate change, about what Trump said or about what your mother-in-law's aunt said even as they wage wars for control of all of the oil in the world. Do you really want the people who are stockpiling the worlds nuclear arsenal, big banking and big oil and their science administration shills (who beg for grant funding like good dogs barking for their biscuits) guiding your environmental senses? Remember, nothing happens by accident and all the apparently spontaneous wars were pre-planned years, this is well established.
Most importantly these people will wage war or destroy any country that interferes with the petrodollar system, let alone with fossil fuels. You need to be naive to the point of stupidity if you really think they have any notion of quitting fossil fuels.
Image Courtesy VOX
All of the carbon dioxide that we pump into the atmosphere came from the atmosphere to make fossil fuels through photosynthesis, in the first place. Millions of years ago carbon dioxide levels were seven times higher than they are now, such as in the Jurassic and Cretacious
(and have been much higher than that even) and both animal and plant life on Earth began to thrive. Even Coral reefs had major ups and downs while carbon dioxide levels were much higher than now. For a comprehensive collection of resources on every aspect of climate change imaginable, I have put together this database hub.
A real "get a grip on reality" scenario for climate enthusiasts is that polar ice area returns to normal at each pole, during the winter months, because the poles are in 24/7 darkness for most of their respective winters. This shows the tremendous power of solar irradiance on polar ice area and melting glaciers. 2014 was a peak high for Antarctic polar ice area. In short, you cannot trust the MSM on the issue of Climate Change, you only need to take a look at this appalling record they have on the subject to realise that.
Yeah, so it's the Rockefellers who are behind Exxon plus the criticism of Exxon's climate change policy.
Along with them, you will find the globalist institutions they crafted like the EU, The UN, The IPCC or any other arch globalist body involved with the Paris Climate Accord. Why do they do this? Because they are the puppet masters, and they control all of the strings to all of us peasants via their puppets, our leaders. And we appear to like it that way, being the peasant stock that we are, we really like it that way, and we believe whatever the Rockefellers and Rothschilds tell their corporate news media outlets as well as what the BBC say, on climate change, Russian collusion, their ISIS and al Qaeda fighters, or their fake progressive candidates, like Bernie Sanders. Perhaps then this arrangement is all we deserve, along with the financial misery that comes with it. I for one will not accept it, no matter how much I am slut-shamed by the rest of the peasants.
There are many theories accounting for the high level of corruption in science, at the bottom of this post I will list links to previous posts related to the subject. Some say that that it has to do with suppressing free energy and relates back to Nikolai Tesla and beyond. Some say that it has to do with justifying the billions spent on taxpayer-funded initiatives from CERN to the large hadron collider. Others say it has more to do with the guardians of the outdated standard model justifying their positions politically. I really don't know to be honest, but Wallace Thornhill does a bang-up job explaining it in the clip below and I'm inclined to agree with him until a better circumstantial case of motive comes along. We must remember that the evidence is already in for the corruption regarding the fraudulent standard model being outdated, but does the establishment dogmatically stick by it because they are slow on the uptake? unlikely if you ask me. They are scientists after all so we must go with the likelihood that they are not stupid. It really appears to me that it must be corruption at some or other level. The only speculation I am engaged in is substantiating the motive.
The latest mm observations of hi-tech telescopes in space, The Herschel Observatory and the Planck Telescope have served as nothing more than a death blow to the outdated model of the universe which has gravity as its only tool in a dead universe. The forefront of an entirely new scientific paradigm is emerging that encompasses gravity (and seeks to better understand both mass and gravity) with the vibrant electrodynamics of electricity and magnetism. I suggest reading my previous post: https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/01/is-structural-nature-of-universe.html
The electrodynamic model, already patented as "The Electric Universe" by The Thunderbolts Project, provides regular updates, corrections, speculations, theories, hypothesis and newly established facts in its series "Space News" which can be found on YouTube and is by far and away the best channel for avoiding the dogma of the outdated scientific establishment seeking to justify its grant funding of multibillion-dollar/euro CERN supercolliders and arrays in various locations. Not surprisingly, they cover the scientific project that is surely the most important project on earth, The SAFIRE PROJECT which seeks to empirically quantify and record all the data revealed by those aspects of a new understanding of the electrodynamics of space which are scalable in laboratory conditions. This data can then be mined as we go forward with all the observations the existing and future space telescopes send in, as well as all the space missions which constantly reveal "impossible observations" (usually explainable simply and elegantly by electrodynamics).
I chose the below presentation not only because its fascinating, but because it takes a rare philosophical take on its body of work, the recently proven interstellar medium and reasons for the desperation to cling onto the standard cosmological model which has reached the zenith of its explanatory powers as it regresses into obsoletion, The description of life should not be restricted to chemical systems, but to electric systems as well.
For a reminder of the history and current status of the SAFIRE PROJECT here is their 2018 report below. I will post their 2019 report which will include 4 new papers in around July/August this year.
Electric Universe - United KingdomInternational Conference & Symposium
7th - 11th July 2018, Somerset, UK
Dr. Michael Clarage talks about his work with SAFIRE from a more philosophical perspective – what an empiricist might ponder outside the lab.
He offers some intriguing if not startling observations about the astronomical and the biological, the dead and the living universe.
Satire of a Time cover poking fun at the confused state of affairs.
This clip below is the simplest, most clear explanation I have seen to date and it's made by the worlds most accurate long term weather forecaster. Made back in 2014 it accounts for events over the last 5 years beautifully too. This is a death blow to AGW for anyone who is paying attention.
Mike Maloney was one of the first to seriously put forward that the dollar would be knocked of its perch as global reserve currency. He did it before the data even presented itself as clear. This is an important update because the indicators are starting to align with the astute predictions made from understanding monetary history and making clever reads on the global geopolitical stage.
The plot thickens.
Things don't happen in isolation. The below quick take is a good one from the staff at The Duran. See if you can start to piece together the connection between global geopolitics and the economic consequences because change is coming and we could well be there within a decade or so. This is a very short time for such a fundamental change in the global order. Interesting times are ahead.
