🔵 Plasma Cosmology, The Electric Universe & The Thunderbolts Project - Difference/ Background/ Basic Tutorials (Pt 1)

Plasma Cosmology:  

Modern Plasma Cosmology has evolved from but is inspired by what was once known as the "Plasma Universe" It puts forward that gravity is not the dominant force in the universe, and that electrodynamic forces are as important or more important (depending on the order of magnitude).  It is centered around a connected universe where charge separation is prevalent, but its scope and focus remain rooted in astronomy including Cosmology and Astrophysics. Not every Plasma Cosmology devotee has the same position, but it generally retains the thermonuclear core star principle from the Standard Model despite radically different views on star formation.

Electric Universe Paradigm:

Uses the principles above in all astronomical matters but goes further by invoking the Electric Sun Model, which has a variety of possibilities rooted in self-contained plasma magnetic entities, double-layers and arc discharge anode-cathode heliosphere principles that will be explained later on.  The EU paradigm goes significantly further by making the case that the principles defining Plasma Cosmology must therefore be in play in fields such as Geology, Archaeology, Biology, Weather and more since the plasma state of matter is the state we find in over 99℅ of the matter in existence. The Electric Universe highlights how an "overall universal charge" is not needed.  Neither is a "source for all the electrons". This is simply because of the clear and pervasive influence of many forms of charge separation on all scales.  That means the principles should apply broadly throughout our reality since this would be an inescapable logical consequence of the laws of Classical Physics.

The Thunderbolts Project: 

TBP is one movement within the EU community, without doubt the leading influencer.  It goes further yet in scope by reinvestigation of historical events through the EU prism. TBP introduces the potent angle of a spirit of cross disciplinary co-operation as an antidote to the over specialisation that we see in science today. Thunderbolts is also known for its novel view of placing value in the vast libraries of resources available to researchers in ancient mythology. This becomes valuable not by subjective speculation but by using a system where the archetypes of global myths are extracted, and it follows logically that the common themes must regarded as a source of historical value commensurate with how widely proliferated they are, especially when understood through Electric Universe principles.

NB: Foreword

If you are like me, someone with a keen interest all things science, you may feel a certain degree of resistance to these ideas after so much exposure to the science of "Big-Bang" cosmology (The LAMBDA-CDM concordance model) and all the spin that comes with it.  I would urge you to overcome those feelings if your sense of certainty gives you the need to dismiss this science out of hand.  That would be an unfortunate error in judgement that will cost you a rich source of the most elegant and powerfully predictive science currently available.

If you are indeed willing to open your mind to these findings you will open yourself up to the extraordinary explanatory powers of Plasma Cosmology and The Electric Universe. At this point a remarkable thing happens: 

You will find that most of the dead ends in the space sciences will suddenly seem like new horizons.  

Pay no mind to those "debunking" videos on YouTube or other mainstream platforms.  I will get to why they are so weak.  Better still, I will place you in a position to have enough of a grasp of the fundamentals that you will not take them seriously and may even be able start spotting the agendas behind the attacks.  Usually, they are out of a sense of feeling threatened. Unbeknown to some this is actually an extremely well backed up set of disciplines experimentally and is not as much at the mercy of the musings of the more theoretical physics as the standard model is, nor to the projections or modelling mathmagicians (in cases where they conflict with observations) either. As with anything, it's not immune to errors or hypotheses and has a healthy appetite for reviewing its own body of work. It's vital to keep in mind at all times that The Electric Universe now has many voices and no one voice speaks on behalf of all. It encourages speculation but always seems perfectly clear on the boundary of where there are proven principles based on such fundamentals as Maxwells equations and alternatively when there is speculating.  Compared to Theoretical Physics of standard models it speculates in increments instead of compounding layers of assumption on top of each other creating a house of cards. Such speculation is very sensible and as such it is very healthy.  

However:

What you will not find...

You will not find speculation that "reality is a two-dimensional hologram projected onto the surface of a three-dimensional sphere" here.  Nothing real exists in two dimensions, it boggles the mind that String Theorists could overlook that obvious fact!  Neither will you learn that reality exists in eleven or more spatial dimensions as the mathematics of trendy theoretical physics requires. 

This is because there are only three spatial dimensions.  A "dimension" in mathematics merely represents a degree of freedom and should never substitute for real world representation, relatability, ability to communicate in principle what concept means and most importantly the one thing modern astrophysics repeatedly ask you to disregard in a form of brainwashing.  That thing is common sense.  Place value in it. 

Observation must be explainable in cause/ effect terms as was always done in classical physics. These should all be self-evident, and it goes without saying that they are all critical aspects of what the new cosmology must be.  I am here to tell you that this is possible, it's already been achieved!  There are very important consequences. In this regard you will not find that over 80% of the universe is mysterious invisible "dark matter" here, or that (together with the equally fantastical "dark energy") almost all of the universe has turned out to be "missing".

What are the main space sciences?

Astronomy is the broad strokes science of all celestial bodies., planets, moons etc in the night sky. It's involved with the physics somewhat, but also mapping, charting, practical application of telescope and observatory resources and incorporates under it both Astrophysics & Cosmology.  The institutions under the current establishment do not teach competing hypotheses and despite heavy competition for funding interally it must be said that overall the status quo has the monopoly on public funding and the public understanding of science.

Astrophysics involves itself principally with the actual physics involved with these bodies. It's become increasingly mathematically reliant and as an example it would attempt to deal with the problematic physics of the thermonuclear fusion model of the sun, or the infinities laden black hole physics as well as interface with such things as String Theory etc. Cosmology is tasked with the ultimate quest. The big picture questions. What is the origin and fate of the universe. Should we persist with the failing LAMBDA-CDM standard cosmological model or look at contenders to the throne such as Plasma Cosmology. Despite an overlap with Astrophysics, it is Cosmology that will ultimately be discipline that we use as our arena for questions beyond the overall model, such as:

• Was there a big bang?
• How old is the universe?
• What are space and time? 
• How many dimensions are they set in?
• What is the Cosmic Web? 
• What is the origin of comets etc.
• What is "embedded space" and is it a consequence of or setting for space and time?

Its Cosmology that was once referred to as the "queen of the sciences".

And may I cordially welcome you to the rabbit hole! 

 An introduction to the Electric Universe by the founders of The Thunderbolts Project. 

 Getting a sense of the current landscape in Astronomy, Cosmology and Astrophysics:  

Below: The nature of the current insurgency, why it's so critical it must happen, and a succinct overview of the sun's electrical environment. The embedded clip below includes a quick overview of how exactly it works. This is an important fundamental aspect of understanding what is to follow. 

NB* Watch me! 

An overview of Plasma Cosmology is HERE

Urgent: "We only have 12 years left before we extend the deadline to a later date!" Climate Scientists

Global warming became "climate change" and word on the street is that "climate fiasco" or "climate farce" is the front-runner for the next rebrand.

WORLD—Climate experts have solemnly warned that we only have twelve years left until they change the dates on globalwarming again. (Continued below link)

https://www.thegwpf.com/english-summer-failing-to-meet-alarmist-expectations/?fbclid=IwAR3M-9kakGMxfcmACciUWnnnwVIAp91W-9ZtLKFy7ahjASKukdYfGYy43lo

"If we don't take action, then in 12 years we will have to explain why the world hasn't ended and come up with a new number," one UN scientist warned. "This is a very serious threat, and we urge everyone to hand control of the economy to the government immediately before we have no more time left to change the timeline again."

Climate scientists can't predict what will happen next year, but we trust them to predict 12 or 30 years ahead? That's why this complete and utter failure happened happened!   (Link)

The scientific consensus is that roughly 10-12 years from now, the world will be flooded with new doomsday predictions. This can all be avoided if we overhaul the economy and become socialists, according to non-political, unbiased sciencey type guys.

"Should we not change our ways, our old predictions will melt, dangerously raising the chance of us having to move the goalposts again," said Al Gore. "Do you really want me to write another book, film another movie, and go on another tour in my private jet just because you dingbats couldn't be bothered to alter your lifestyles? I don't think so. Let's all get on board with this 12-year figure, or we'll have to push back the date again." 

Keep reading at the link below

https://babylonbee.com/news/experts-warn-we-have-only-12-years-left-until-they-change-the-dates-on-global-warming-again?fbclid=IwAR0jGlodhnUuLBw3683e9ADC4TfYewFP2PHKdjuzIv-wINrPY21IjOgJL9g

More climate change satire? 

Click here

⏪ A stunning revision of the past which could be as unbelievable as any science fiction blockbuster (Part 1)

INTRODUCTION 

The requirement of a frame of reference.

"What if the defining catastrophe of the human part of world history has no observable equivalent occurrences today? Surely, we would entirely leave it out of our picture?"

According to Wikipedia, which represents the establishment view of most matters, the substance and starting point of our history is as follows:

Quote

"The history of the world, in common parlance, is the history of humanity (or human history), as determined from archaeology, anthropology, genetics, linguistics, and other disciplines; and, for periods since the invention of writing, from recorded history and from secondary sources and studies.

Humanity's written history was preceded by its prehistory, beginning with the Palaeolithic Era ("Early Stone Age"), followed by the Neolithic Era ("New Stone Age"). The Neolithic saw the Agricultural Revolution begin, between 8000 and 5000 BCE, in the Near East's Fertile Crescent. During this period, humans began the systematic husbandry of plants and animals.^[2] As agriculture advanced, most humans transitioned from a nomadic to a settled lifestyle as farmers in permanent settlements. The relative security and increased productivity provided by farming allowed communities to expand into increasingly larger units, fostered by advances in transportation."

End Quote

I don't think the untouchable status the above synopsis once had is given as much credence as it once had.  At the very least it would be fair to say it has lost its reverence. Academics and professionals (and amateurs for that matter) have found various anomalies which don't allow for the established view to stand up to scrutiny.  We may not have a specific nomination of a single "for certain" replacement theory but this is a very exciting time in the landscape. I'd like to give what I consider the leading contenders are for the disruption of the narrative. The clues about our real history.  They all come together in surprisingly supportive ways, although those telling these stories may not really fully understand this themselves.

Download the delightful and fascinating book  "Maps Of The Ancient Sea Kings: HERE

(I chose a link where you can view first before downloading because default downloads of large docs annoy me too)

What new evidence is at odds with current thinking?

The reason I have dedicated two full posts just to give the briefest possible outline of slow collapse of the narrative is because there is not one "slam-dunk" reason for it.  Much of the challenge is emerging from fresh thinking emerging out of the information era and sharing of ideas occurring a bit more outside of prevailing structures these days. Always reserve judgement and keep an open mind.  Be mindful of the tendency that the status quo has become ossified and reacts defensively in those instances where points of contention are raised by scientists, academics and engineers from outside of the structures of anthropology, archeology, Egyptology and conventional ancient history.  Even more so when amateurs, authors or journalists contest the prevailing story, and the challenges are never addressed or become lost in a sea of ad hominem attacks usually playing the man and not the ball.  This happens even in cases involving the most well-evidenced or well-made cases.  That is why it is vital that you do not get drawn in by such an approach.  It stems from a political mindset of individual agendas of no interest to you and I.  If you are curious about the subject matter as I am you will surely agree that the quest for an objective perspective can only be nurtured by the decision to always and only focus on the caliber and academic fortitude of whichever case is being subjected to scrutiny. 

1) Clandestine Cover Ups

We all enjoy scandal and intrigue. Conspiracy (especially ancient conspiracy) is interesting.   While there are surely and surprisingly many of these controversies in play, we must not lose perspective.  The damage done by those seeking to protect past interests have done incalculable damage to our ability to fully understand our own past.  This involves a cast of characters to broad to mention but just to give a sense of the problem it's worth noting how diverse they are in range.  From the Jesuits whose agenda is impossible to fully assess, to colonial agendas, the Catholic Church at the height of its power and even the ideologically motivated seemingly sober minded monks that rewrote so many historical texts (often by first destroying the original source documents).  Don't think of it as artifact of past power structures, I assure you it happens even today and is no less prevalent.  Players like ARCE and the Smithsonian immediately spring to mind with their endless mischief while they enjoy unquestioned admiration from institutions of the prevailing establishment.  That being said, these cover-ups still represent the minority of "things that don't add up" in ancient history, since so many things don't add up. Just ask any regular tour guide in Egypt and you will hear about how boring old history is surrounded by more drama, lying and politics than the US Department of State.

I think a good place to start would first be a quick mention of the corruption inherent in the protection of the standard narrative. There are a variety of motives and so many examples that in order to avoid that theme hijacking this post I have decided to make it the subject of its own upcoming post. Scandal is always interesting.  To give a few clues as to the scale of the known deceit and regular cover up going on, where Egyptology (very relevant here) is a serial worst offender. This tip off sent into a known YouTube channel is a great example out of many known to plague the field. I will focus on academic examples in my upcoming post, I've chosen an example that demonstrates that open-source contributions can be made by anyone willing to travel that is willing to wander from the beaten path. To save time (if you are in a hurry) skip the intro of this particular example and track to 5.20 .

The above example is an easy to post example of what I mean, but in reality these examples are everywhere. To see what I mean listen to the background discussion in most of the clips I include in this post, the reason I always add multimedia is that it can give an expanded sense of the atmosphere. There are often grumbles of secret digs, sealed off corridor's or missing archaeological artefact's and physical evidence that mysteriously goes missing, without the expected investigation following it.

2) Standard political or commercial cover-ups. 

Another form of cover up involves less mysterious motives and usually involves the prosaic fact that archeological digs take up lots of time and involve the zoning of land. That is to say that the prospect of land going to commercial or industrial interests for development starts to appear being out of the question. Either that or in some similar way interferes with some or other special interest group or government.  The below example involving the cover up of the great Labyrinth of Egypt.  This famous site is of no less historical status and reputation than the Pyramids on the Giza Plateau themselves and just like the Great Pyramid was part of the super prestigious list of wonders of the ancient world.  How could anyone believe that such a find was discovered and then covered up by Egypt's own government?  Believe it!  In fact, that site never stood a chance, and the reason is just as clear and obvious as it is frustrating.

Ben van Kerkwyk explains how the construction of the Aswan Dam, a modern-day mega-engineering project in Egypt, caused a rise in the water table of several meters, making the prospect of a dig costing billions loom large for the authorities, a gamble they were not prepared to take and a decision they were not prepared to admit they made. 

3) Denial, consensus cover-ups, protecting monopolies on public funding, public understanding of science, careers, tenure & nepotism

There is no single citation that does this cover up justice because 90% of all cover ups likely fall into this category.  Most of the rest of the post as well as the follow up post, part 2, falls into this category.  Although, between you and I, deep down inside I harbor suspicion that a fair bit more actually falls into category 1 above. However, since I cannot prove such a thing, I cannot state it categorically.

South Africa: Land and Taxes Part 3: From the Reserve Bank to the president.

Because I'm so frustrated with the narrative of media coverage in SA, and the entire framing of issues in the minds of South Africans, I'm going to do a whole series of posts on Banks, Mines, The JSE, the bogus reasoning of all our political parties etc. I'll be attempting to completely reframe the way we think about things here in SA.

Do not believe the MSN that the ANC Government is fully in control of the nation, do not believe the "State Capture " MSM reports regarding former president Zuma. That is SA's "Russiagate" . Even though our central bank works differently,  which a limited dividend private sharhealing from the public domain to compliment the cabal control,  private shareholders have no say in policy, and despite media lies, the government is not in control of its mandate, and it has tried to influence the mandate only to be met with thinly veiled threats from the big capital interests to sink the Rand. 

Blue text is an active link. 

Just when I thought Rhamaphosa was coming right, three months after saying all the right things we are losing momentum again.  Bankster trained economists knee jerk reaction to nationalising the SARB is always the same, point to the Rand moving downwards on news (will always happen, but we need the appetite and courage to overcome little bumps if we deserve our sovereignty).  They will also point to "foreign investment" and the bankster run credit ratings agencies, the ones that rated all the junk stocks as Tripple ""AAA"" just before the 2008 crises.  All of these are strongarm tactics designed to maintain the globalist banker capture of our state, the real state capture.

Here he is getting it right 3 months ago:

But old habits die hard, and that inspiration seems to be fading, or he has once more been gotten to.

This article is about how the SARB, aided by commercial banks steals prosperity from us and our children whilst it transfers wealth from the common people, the taxpayers, to the global fat-cat elites (From whom Rhamaphosa professes to want to reclaim land, but in fact it works the other way around because home loans are not loaned from a capital or asset account but created by banks magically on their balance sheet and the new currency starts its life on the national balance sheet as debt owed by a citizen to a bank despite no loan occurring, yet there is somehow exorbitant interest attached to the "loan" and defaults are seized by the banks.  This is nothing more than wealth transfer.  We must not lose sight of the fact that ultimately its property and land that have value, not the paper fiat currency which is not backed by anything other than SARB inflationary overprinting and bank overlending) but in essence this method is used in all countries because the central bankers have control over the whole global currency system and use similar methods everywhere.  You cannot mine on anything but land, farm on anything but land, or live on anything but land.

Do not harbour under the illusions that "White Owned" or "Black Owned" political talking points have any bearing on our reality, now influenced more by globalization and colonial legacy far more than race-baiting political baiting.  The land issue can only be resolved after the Reserve bank is nationalised and the banks are reformed. But that is a global battle, not just a local, and we all know what happened to the last few countries who dared keep sovereign control of their central banks (I'll give you a clue, those countries were/are Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Somalia, and North Korea....)

Do not harbour under any illusions of SARB reform or Treasury reform is imminent.

Before reading this I suggest checking out my earlier articles on the SARB and money creation:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2015/11/exposing-south-african-reserve-bank.html
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/04/the-sa-reserve-bank-67-tons-of-rands-on.html
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/04/money-printing-for-dummies.html

Governments can never repay the national debt, this is by design, and must always pay for civil and other services by DEFICIT SPENDING (meaning borrowing the money from private banks like the SARB)  If the government could simply issue its own currency, there would be no steadily increasing national debt, and a balancing the budget without deficit spending would become a priority with a sound money Austrian Economics approach rather than a Globalist Keynesian approach. However, since we (or our government on our behalf) borrow from private banksters who act as brokers for bondholders, a fractional reserve style, liquidity gearing national debt is created and the majority of all our tax we pay every month goes to servicing the interest portion of the national debt and paying the banksters.  Let's be clear on that, our tax pays the banks. Because money is borrowed at interest there is never enough to service the principle "debt" and money must always be borrowed for this purpose. Only the interest is serviced and the principle is never resolved, that is the goal. As far as the mechanics of this chicanery is concerned, this is done by issuing treasury bonds sold to the "Primary Dealers" (International bankster cabal like the usual suspect Rothschilds; Rockefellers as well as those same interests behind JP Morgan Deutsche Bank, Investec ; Citi) as well as SA's big four banks who are also owned in part by the banksters who own the SARB by a similar system of shareholder arrangements that evolved over time by mergers and acquisitions. Only a small portion of public shareholders have Reserve bank shares and shareholder arrangments centre this control out of germany.

The Bonds are auctioned off every second Friday in South Africa:
https://www.jse.co.za/trade/debt-market/bonds/government-bonds
https://wwwrs.resbank.co.za/mcm/showcontrib.aspx?category=BA

And there are a few scant reports in the media about certain aspects of this corruption, but a poor understanding of a public primed to focus on other issues by the media means no real interest in the most important issue facing all of us every day, the hidden theft of most of our money.
http://mg.co.za/article/2012-01-13-jse-tackles-primary-dealers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_dealer

These primary dealers make a "Secondary Market" (IE make a further profit off us by privileged of the mandate of first creating money with interest to turn us into debt slaves servicing our national debt with tax, then selling the bonds at profit in a secondary market.

Once this happens the bonds ensure all debt by the future taxation of a nation's children to service the interest for the international banksters. That's why Government Bonds are such secure investments, they are guaranteed by taxation of the public. We are the surety, our blood sweat and tears insure their profit.  Because of technology, the inflation (hidden taxation and savings destroyer) that is eroding our standard of living, compensates for the productivity deficit that builds, but one salary is no longer enough and soon we will have to co-habitat because we will not be able to have families afford their own homes as money loses it's purchasing power.

This would all stop if we had taxpayer oversight instead of an "Independent" SARB, based on real money, a store of VALUE instead of fiat currency which is created from DEBT.  Fiat currency and Keynesian chicanery are how the banksters pull the wool over our eyes, and since CODESA the government are mere administrators, those that truly control our economy will never give it up because those are the people that destroy entire countries to bring their central banks under their control. They would likewise sooner destroy the country (or than return it to the citizens. Their MO is divide and conquer, so they would more likely get that country to destroy itself, and South Africa is rife with potential divisions to exploit.  It;s safe to say that Rhamaphosa will not take meaningful action against the SARB, and his nepotism is no better than Zuma's, but concerns should go beyond that, (relatively little attention has been paid to the fact that the Total discovery of a gas field south off Mossel Bay – which Ramaphosa and Gwede Mantashe expressed delight about, stands to benefit just one South African individual, businessman Phutuma Nhleko, to the tune of potentially hundreds of billions) and more.  Concerns should go beyond his being a member of the board at Lonmin (London Mining SA) and Marikana, beyond his time at MTM and McDonalds.  It should also look beyond his joint venture with coal cabal Glencore and the costly coal price weighing so heavily on South Africans for electricity generation and beyond the two decades he spent immersing himself in the world of capital finance, a world far from the base and much closer to the controlling Bank interests of the South African Reserve, who are the same interests behind the climate change behind the scenes restructuring of our economy at the cost to the people, and the same people whose renewable energy plans and climate change cabal fixing of the coal price have caused massive operational cost hikes in Eskom, all loosely aligned to form the real group who have no plans to give land back to South Africans, despite what the President says.  Those people may be laundered in with local JSE fatcats or corporate entities, but ultimately those are offshore interests, such as behind the banks, Anglo, farms/vineyards/paper forest plantations or our energy reserves which will not benefit the people but rather fall victim to nepotism or bankster cronyism, just like our money supply.

These interests are laughing at us, because while they and their ilk have a long history of this, their insiders like Trevor Manual the Rothschild man, Tito Mbowemi the Goldman sacks man, Pravin Ghordan and Rhamaphosa himself will focus on "Land Reform" being a divide and conquer strategy along racial lines, and to keep the presidents perception problem with the black vote at bay, South Africans are too busy fighting among themselves demographically to spot the unseen hand operating the levers from afar.

This was a continuation of post:
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/06/south-africa-land-and-taxes-part-2.html

Ramaphosa backstory:

lesson 101

By

Mtho Sibiya Nge Khomo

Cyril Ramaphosa was recruited as a Spy from the Police Reservists in 1971 (his father was also an SAP).

His University fees were paid by Urban Foundation of the Oppenheimers. 

While he was in his 20s, the Transvaal Mining houses led by the Oppenheimers and the Menels, they made him the head of Africa's biggest union (founded by White mining bosses, the Rand Club): NUM. 

In 1990, Craig Williamson, the NIA spy who successfully infiltrated the ANC inserted Ramaphosa on the Mandela Welcoming/Reception Committee even though Ramaphosa was not a member of the ANC and was not known by UDF. 

Ramaphosa was entered into the ANC Elective Conference without Credentials (since he has joined the ANC that very year in 1991). 

Even though he was young and unknown, Ramaphosa won becoming the SG or main administrator of the ANC: effectively meaning the ANC was captured by the White Apartheid State through Ramaphosa. 

The Media suddenly claimed that he was Mandela's preferred successor (the same Media support he receives now).

In an old TV episode with Evita Bezeidenhod; Ramaphos is shown at a large farm with no explanation how he obtain the farm. 

Pro-Black parties such as the PAC, Azapo and BCM were killed off in favour of the captured ANC which Negotiated at CODESA on behalf of Black people with Ramaphosa as Chief Negotiator.

He delivered for White Apartheid beneficiaries by giving us a pro-White (Sunset Clauses) Canadian Constitution with European values and maintaining the Vestigates of Apartheid and colonial gain such as Land. 

Ramaphosa was awarded for his Double Agent work by being made a Billionaire. 

The ANC was pressured by Business to appoint Ramaphosa as Zuma's Deputy in order to attract business. 

When Zuma did do that; he was suddenly poisoned with the same GEM that killed Yasser Arafat. Zuma was saved by Russian doctors (and MaNtuli was blamed). 

Remember how the Rating Agencies and the Media was worked up to high Anti-Zuma hysteria which all died down when Ramaphosa took over

Homepage:     https://dwahts.blogspot.com

Globalist Coin? Would the Globalists use a cryptocurrency for their One-World-Currency?

Issuing digital Fiat Currency was always going to be the candidate for the famed "Öne-World-Currency" planned by the internationalist central banking "NWO" because typing ones and zeros onto your digital balance sheet by legal mandate was always going to be easier than printing physical money. But digital Fiat Currency is not a Cryptocurrency.  The only thing they have in common is being digital.  The globalist angle here is actually a cashless society to completely control the grid (meaning credit card transactions, payments, foreign exchange and bank accounts)  This way they shut out what used to be known free-market capitalism in the good old days, now known as the informal sector.  Such entrepreneurial enterprises outside of the centralised framework of banking, SWIFT, PAYPAL, and the bankster frameworks of foreign exchange and Visa/Mastercard accepted by all the retail monopolies, usually globalist retail companies by policy rather than ideology even if they are not multinationals because they are still corporate.  Crypro may shut out beggars for now but even though it's digital its decentralised and controlled by the people on a distributed network of peers via a blockchain rather than some standardised SAP system under centralised bankster administration.  This clip will demonstrate how Bitcoin is boosting the informal sector, particularly the dark web and the surprising conclusions.we can now come to.

The other important factor is that real crypto cannot be printed by some shadowy central cabal, by government or by corporations, it has to be mined.  This would collapse the economy where the banksters rely on QE money printing for their means of control, so digital currency and cryptocurrency have even less in common than most people think.

Here are my requirements for real crypto if you are interested.

The establishment oligarchs have taken gold and silver, peoples money, and issued our currency for us.  Their oligarchy establishment will only accept their currency and can turn you off from their grid under centralised control at any moment.  Without cash, you would be utterly lost in that situation.  With crypto, you could at least transact anonymously if you know the means and nobody can "switch you off".

This is the main reason why I will not go full socialist under corporate/govt administration as long as we are on a monetary system, although it does seem likely that some or other form of socialism may be needed for a long time yet for medical, pension, military, prisons and social services to keep the multinational globalist vultures away from the benefits that they are entitled to since it's their tax that funds it. Those that take a simple "pro" or änti" stance on capitalism lack imagination or don't understand that socialism can be used by malicious forces just as capitalist forces do on Wall Street today.  Capitalism is evolving away from the oligarchs to the people by the following means, slowly reintegrating into society":

Capitalism can be for the people or entrepreneurial even today, even though it's moving outside the formal sector, which the globalists would consider "The Establishment."

Examples:

• Cryptocurrency
• Street Vendors
• Some taxi drivers outside of globalist schemes like Uber
• The black market
• Smuggling 
• The Dark Web
• Stokvels
• Spazza Shops
• etc... basically anywhere where they don't take credit cards.

So why would the globalists want Crypto? I doubt it, but there are rumours that if Hashgraph is used instead of blockchain, which solves the Byzantine Generals problem of consensus, is not open source software, the crypto may not be decentralised, especially if they use pre-mined tokens, and all sorts of back-doors could exist for the globalists to move into, copyright or monopolise rather than destroy cryptocurrency.  They are already buying and gaming crypto, but this will never give them the control they need, they just influence the investment value.  Ultimately crypto is increasing in value due to scarcity whereas fiat is inflationary due to expanding the currency supply faster than goods and services, and deficit spending growing faster than GDP.

The fiat currency "One World Currency" would likely be digital, and follow a similar path that the Euro did with the globalist EU single currency zone, it would not be a cryptocurrency.  The IMF already has the prototype, the Special Drawing Right, known as the SDR, currently being made into a currency basket with the USD, Euro, Yuan, Ruble in preparation for phase-in after the IMF forecloses on the Fed, whenever that may be.

That being said, the following developments are interesting:

The above clip gives a thorough synopsis, but here are some contrasting takes from differently aligned sources:

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/05/facebook-cryptocurrency-coming-in-june-report.html

https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2019/06/06/facebook-globalcoin-cryptocurrency/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2019/06/06/facebooks-radical-bitcoin-beating-cryptocurrency-plans-revealed/#45bce3053564

Keep watching that space!

Having a free market of various cryptocurrencies has its benefits,  such as not having central bank monopoly of the money creation process and having them LOAN BACK our money to us as if it were theirs and afford bondholders investment opportunity with the nation's taxation as surety just to enable deficit spending, but there is a caveat.  One of the fundamental points of having a non-inflationary cryptocurrency is precisely because having only a fixed number of Bitcoins or whatever able to be mined, scarcity is ensured, but removing limits on the number of crypto's themselves defeats this purpose because even if the banksters are not creating the actual currency, the system can be gamed, so it will interesting to see how the community deals with this challenge.

New York Times invents fake climate history to match its fake geopolitical history.

Some vintage New York Times propaganda

The New York TImes.  One of Americas trusted names in media.  I certainly trust them, but let me clarify that statement. All their sports scores are accurate, and their telephone number and website address are correct usually,  They have a good spellcheck software option.  Sometimes their page numbers are correct, and their address perhaps. Anything else?"Perhaps their economic indicators are technically accurate, even if they are reported in a completely disingenuous context. Anything else?

Nope, nothing else is correct because they insist on filling their content with "News" and "Politics" and "Climate Change".....

....and let's face it....

They will never get any of that right, so my praise is limited to my opening paragraph which is a testament to nothing more than the staggering misplacement of trust I was referring to in my second sentence.

In the clip below from his YouTube channel, Tony Heller goes back in time and shows us how much hotter summer used to be in the States, but he uses a method that the NYT may not fully understand,  He goes by facts.  He then takes those facts and makes conclusions BASED ON THOSE SAME FACTS!

He could be onto something.  All I know is that if the fact-based reporting on politics, war or climate change ever catches on in the good old USA, all of their MSM is finished.

But let's be serious for a moment here. I am joking around of course, I don't really believe US media will really start reporting facts, not even a flat-earther would believe a wild conspiracy theory like that!

Within 10 years search engines will be so Blue-Pilled as to offer no meaningful information. Here is one way around that scenario.

Following up from:

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/03/alternatives-to-group-think-and.html

There is something amiss in cyberspace.  Searches feel like there is a nanny standing by protecting us from the horrors of alternative takes on world affairs, Google, in particular, is absolutely terrified we could at some stage receive news that is not entirely true (where were they during my childhood and National Enquirer or People Magazine stories of alien abductions).  They are so worried that they have assigned all the worst news companies that have lied us into wars, push hopeless nonsense that is quite patently false, and directly lie.... to vet out news sources.  I don't know what colour the sky is in Google land but last time I checked we are not all fucking morons.  Perhaps 30% of us, sure, and another 30% too busy to bother but the rest of us are not so utterly devoid of our faculties of independent and critical thought that we haven't noticed that after 30 years of global warming panic it hasn't gotten any warmer beyond expected trends (in fact cooling seems to be an issue).

We are not so utterly lacking in mental fortitude as to swallow the rubbish that Google cough's up. Are we?

Censorship is everywhere, a natural successor to "Divide and Rule" means that if we decide today that if, leta say gays or minorities, people of colour or women are to be empowered, we come down hard on any descent. 

Problem is we come down once more on those same groups when we later replace them with Transexuals entering female sport (just ask Martina Navratilova) or pot plants running for president or whatever the hell is in vogue.  The main point is that we are getting used to being silenced, and the symptoms are everywhere in the PC search environment and MSM or social media environment online. 

While the Dark Web is stimulating the revival of a near free market-esque vibe using cryptocurrency to mirror the informal vendors and traders so desperately trying to take back entrepreneurial capitalism from large globalist multinationals, it's not enough. (See fascinating talk in clip below)

We have to build our own search framework around the real world. Establishment search engines are profiled by pro-war, political, partisan, climate change propagandist spin and algorithm weighting.  It should be easy to ditch our fetish with some organic gas vital for life, since anyway that is virtue signaling your way to the globalist agenda. Care about the plane? Try getting those behind the AGW movement to stop producing nuclear bombs and millions of tons of plastic waste instead. They are the same people using the same media.   We need to stop listening to media cheering for us to keep spending trillions on wars and bailing out banks and spend one tenth of that eliminating homelessness and give everyone basic healthcare. The socialism vs capitalism debate is actually moot unless you consider that society should be judged on how it treats its warmongers and banksters, rather than it's sick and old.  Those guys who complain they are paying for the poor are full of shit. The poor are paying for them, do you really want these guys deciding your search parameters by some shadowy unknown policy? Even politicians are sick of it.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/tulsi-gabbard-google-lawsuit-debate-2020-election-tucker

I put it to you that simply searching for correct information would correct the course, and start us back on the road to... we... something other than completely and utterly batshit clueless.

Start with YaCy.

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/YaCy.html

Rather than simply having you type a query into a search box and enjoying results supplied by the engine, YaCy uses installed software through which anyone can contribute to the results, in a decentralized peer-to-peer, crowd-sourced take on Web search. The program also lets organizations build an internal search for their sites or intranets. Finally, YaCy comes with none of the privacy or censorship concerns of Google or the rest, since it doesn't rely on one large company.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_search_engine

This way the more of us that use it, the better the framework of indexed results begins to organically mould towards information we are ACTUALLY LOOKING FOR.

In fact YaCy is more of a framework for peer-to-peer search services, though a demo "portal" lets the curious try out searching on one of the general Web search implementations, called freeworld. But YaCy's makers stress that just using the service without installing the peer-to-peer service destroys the service's basic concept of decentralization. Users who install its software store a piece of the service's index.

Signup and Setup

YaCy's site claims that installation takes just three minutes, and in my case it actually took less than 2 minutes. Installer software is available for Windows, Mac, and GNU/Linux, each about 20MB in size. Luckily, after this quick installation, you don't have to do your searching in the program; everything is done in the browser, just as with any other search service. But this background operation inevitably drains a bit of your system resources and Internet bandwidth. There is a Performance settings page, where YaCy's priority set set to "below normal" by default, but the interface for throttling down the service's bandwidth usage isn't straightforward.

Interface
A system tray icon is pretty much the extent of the installed program's interface. Double-clicking this opens your default browser to a YaCy Web search box. Along the top of the webpage are tabs for Administration, Web Search, Search Network, Peer Owner Profile, and Help/Wiki. In the tradition of Google, the search interface is barebones: You just get a box under the P2P Web Search title, with the only options at this level being text or images.

A "more options" link lets you tell YaCy how many results to display per page (10, 50, or 100), whether to use the P2P network or just a local index. This page also show some search tricks, like parameters to only show results with a specified phrase in the URL, from a specified site, by a certain author. You can also tell YaCy to sort results by date, nearness of search terms, and language. But doing a lot of this is simpler in Google. Options you won't find in that leader are to include Scroogle results (i.e., Google results scraped clean of ads and cookie tracking) or Blekko results.

If you're fond of using your browser's built-in search, YaCy suggests simply "click-open on the default search engine in the upper right search field of your browser and select Add YaCy Search. This worked fine in Firefox, Chrome, and Opera, but Internet Explorer needs a plugin to be created for its search provider site.

YaCy's Administration tools are where you can choose whether you want to use it for regular Web search with Freeworld, for you own Web pages, or an intranet. You can also change your peer's name and port. To help the search service, you'll need to open a hole in your firewall, which the setup tries to do for you.

Googles new censorship and regime change company / Think Tank

Google is no longer just towing the globalist line, it is actively pushing the establishment narrative on all the flashpoint issues where censorship is required and in all the regions where regime change is required.

Welcome to the Orwellian reality of Google's new hybrid think-tank/ Company JIGSAW.

According to establishment mouthpiece, Wikipedia, the sanitised blurb for Jigsaw is as follows:

Jigsaw

Companyjigsaw.google.com

Jigsaw, formerly Google Ideas, is a technology incubator created by Google, and now operated as a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. Based in New York City, Jigsaw is dedicated to understanding global challenges and applying technological solutions, from "countering extremism", online censorship and cyber-attacks, to protecting access to information.Wikipedia

Formerly called:Google Ideas (2010–2015)

Type:Think tank

Founded:2010
Why not decide for yourself:
https://jigsaw.google.com/
Recommended article:https://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/10/18/jigsaw/