South Africa: Land and Taxes Part 3: From the Reserve Bank to the president.

Because I'm so frustrated with the narrative of media coverage in SA, and the entire framing of issues in the minds of South Africans, I'm going to do a whole series of posts on Banks, Mines, The JSE, the bogus reasoning of all our political parties etc. I'll be attempting to completely reframe the way we think about things here in SA.

Do not believe the MSN that the ANC Government is fully in control of the nation, do not believe the "State Capture " MSM reports regarding former president Zuma. That is SA's "Russiagate" . Even though our central bank works differently,  which a limited dividend private sharhealing from the public domain to compliment the cabal control,  private shareholders have no say in policy, and despite media lies, the government is not in control of its mandate, and it has tried to influence the mandate only to be met with thinly veiled threats from the big capital interests to sink the Rand. 


Blue text is an active link. 


Just when I thought Rhamaphosa was coming right, three months after saying all the right things we are losing momentum again.  Bankster trained economists knee jerk reaction to nationalising the SARB is always the same, point to the Rand moving downwards on news (will always happen, but we need the appetite and courage to overcome little bumps if we deserve our sovereignty).  They will also point to "foreign investment" and the bankster run credit ratings agencies, the ones that rated all the junk stocks as Tripple ""AAA"" just before the 2008 crises.  All of these are strongarm tactics designed to maintain the globalist banker capture of our state, the real state capture.

Here he is getting it right 3 months ago:


But old habits die hard, and that inspiration seems to be fading, or he has once more been gotten to.

This article is about how the SARB, aided by commercial banks steals prosperity from us and our children whilst it transfers wealth from the common people, the taxpayers, to the global fat-cat elites (From whom Rhamaphosa professes to want to reclaim land, but in fact it works the other way around because home loans are not loaned from a capital or asset account but created by banks magically on their balance sheet and the new currency starts its life on the national balance sheet as debt owed by a citizen to a bank despite no loan occurring, yet there is somehow exorbitant interest attached to the "loan" and defaults are seized by the banks.  This is nothing more than wealth transfer.  We must not lose sight of the fact that ultimately its property and land that have value, not the paper fiat currency which is not backed by anything other than SARB inflationary overprinting and bank overlending) but in essence this method is used in all countries because the central bankers have control over the whole global currency system and use similar methods everywhere.  You cannot mine on anything but land, farm on anything but land, or live on anything but land.

Do not harbour under the illusions that "White Owned" or "Black Owned" political talking points have any bearing on our reality, now influenced more by globalization and colonial legacy far more than race-baiting political baiting.  The land issue can only be resolved after the Reserve bank is nationalised and the banks are reformed. But that is a global battle, not just a local, and we all know what happened to the last few countries who dared keep sovereign control of their central banks (I'll give you a clue, those countries were/are Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Somalia, and North Korea....)



Do not harbour under any illusions of SARB reform or Treasury reform is imminent.



Before reading this I suggest checking out my earlier articles on the SARB and money creation:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2015/11/exposing-south-african-reserve-bank.html
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/04/the-sa-reserve-bank-67-tons-of-rands-on.html
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/04/money-printing-for-dummies.html


Governments can never repay the national debt, this is by design, and must always pay for civil and other services by DEFICIT SPENDING (meaning borrowing the money from private banks like the SARB)  If the government could simply issue its own currency, there would be no steadily increasing national debt, and a balancing the budget without deficit spending would become a priority with a sound money Austrian Economics approach rather than a Globalist Keynesian approach. However, since we (or our government on our behalf) borrow from private banksters who act as brokers for bondholders, a fractional reserve style, liquidity gearing national debt is created and the majority of all our tax we pay every month goes to servicing the interest portion of the national debt and paying the banksters.  Let's be clear on that, our tax pays the banks. Because money is borrowed at interest there is never enough to service the principle "debt" and money must always be borrowed for this purpose. Only the interest is serviced and the principle is never resolved, that is the goal. As far as the mechanics of this chicanery is concerned, this is done by issuing treasury bonds sold to the "Primary Dealers" (International bankster cabal like the usual suspect Rothschilds; Rockefellers as well as those same interests behind JP Morgan Deutsche Bank, Investec ; Citi) as well as SA's big four banks who are also owned in part by the banksters who own the SARB by a similar system of shareholder arrangements that evolved over time by mergers and acquisitions. Only a small portion of public shareholders have Reserve bank shares and shareholder arrangments centre this control out of germany.

The Bonds are auctioned off every second Friday in South Africa:
https://www.jse.co.za/trade/debt-market/bonds/government-bonds
https://wwwrs.resbank.co.za/mcm/showcontrib.aspx?category=BA

And there are a few scant reports in the media about certain aspects of this corruption, but a poor understanding of a public primed to focus on other issues by the media means no real interest in the most important issue facing all of us every day, the hidden theft of most of our money.
http://mg.co.za/article/2012-01-13-jse-tackles-primary-dealers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_dealer

These primary dealers make a "Secondary Market" (IE make a further profit off us by privileged of the mandate of first creating money with interest to turn us into debt slaves servicing our national debt with tax, then selling the bonds at profit in a secondary market.

Once this happens the bonds ensure all debt by the future taxation of a nation's children to service the interest for the international banksters. That's why Government Bonds are such secure investments, they are guaranteed by taxation of the public. We are the surety, our blood sweat and tears insure their profit.  Because of technology, the inflation (hidden taxation and savings destroyer) that is eroding our standard of living, compensates for the productivity deficit that builds, but one salary is no longer enough and soon we will have to co-habitat because we will not be able to have families afford their own homes as money loses it's purchasing power.

This would all stop if we had taxpayer oversight instead of an "Independent" SARB, based on real money, a store of VALUE instead of fiat currency which is created from DEBT.  Fiat currency and Keynesian chicanery are how the banksters pull the wool over our eyes, and since CODESA the government are mere administrators, those that truly control our economy will never give it up because those are the people that destroy entire countries to bring their central banks under their control. They would likewise sooner destroy the country (or than return it to the citizens. Their MO is divide and conquer, so they would more likely get that country to destroy itself, and South Africa is rife with potential divisions to exploit.  It;s safe to say that Rhamaphosa will not take meaningful action against the SARB, and his nepotism is no better than Zuma's, but concerns should go beyond that, (relatively little attention has been paid to the fact that the Total discovery of a gas field south off Mossel Bay – which Ramaphosa and Gwede Mantashe expressed delight about, stands to benefit just one South African individual, businessman Phutuma Nhleko, to the tune of potentially hundreds of billions) and more.  Concerns should go beyond his being a member of the board at Lonmin (London Mining SA) and Marikana, beyond his time at MTM and McDonalds.  It should also look beyond his joint venture with coal cabal Glencore and the costly coal price weighing so heavily on South Africans for electricity generation and beyond the two decades he spent immersing himself in the world of capital finance, a world far from the base and much closer to the controlling Bank interests of the South African Reserve, who are the same interests behind the climate change behind the scenes restructuring of our economy at the cost to the people, and the same people whose renewable energy plans and climate change cabal fixing of the coal price have caused massive operational cost hikes in Eskom, all loosely aligned to form the real group who have no plans to give land back to South Africans, despite what the President says.  Those people may be laundered in with local JSE fatcats or corporate entities, but ultimately those are offshore interests, such as behind the banks, Anglo, farms/vineyards/paper forest plantations or our energy reserves which will not benefit the people but rather fall victim to nepotism or bankster cronyism, just like our money supply.

These interests are laughing at us, because while they and their ilk have a long history of this, their insiders like Trevor Manual the Rothschild man, Tito Mbowemi the Goldman sacks man, Pravin Ghordan and Rhamaphosa himself will focus on "Land Reform" being a divide and conquer strategy along racial lines, and to keep the presidents perception problem with the black vote at bay, South Africans are too busy fighting among themselves demographically to spot the unseen hand operating the levers from afar.

This was a continuation of post:
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/06/south-africa-land-and-taxes-part-2.html

Ramaphosa backstory:

lesson 101
By
Mtho Sibiya Nge Khomo

Cyril Ramaphosa was recruited as a Spy from the Police Reservists in 1971 (his father was also an SAP).
His University fees were paid by Urban Foundation of the Oppenheimers. 
While he was in his 20s, the Transvaal Mining houses led by the Oppenheimers and the Menels, they made him the head of Africa's biggest union (founded by White mining bosses, the Rand Club): NUM. 
In 1990, Craig Williamson, the NIA spy who successfully infiltrated the ANC inserted Ramaphosa on the Mandela Welcoming/Reception Committee even though Ramaphosa was not a member of the ANC and was not known by UDF. 
Ramaphosa was entered into the ANC Elective Conference without Credentials (since he has joined the ANC that very year in 1991). 
Even though he was young and unknown, Ramaphosa won becoming the SG or main administrator of the ANC: effectively meaning the ANC was captured by the White Apartheid State through Ramaphosa. 
The Media suddenly claimed that he was Mandela's preferred successor (the same Media support he receives now).
In an old TV episode with Evita Bezeidenhod; Ramaphos is shown at a large farm with no explanation how he obtain the farm. 
Pro-Black parties such as the PAC, Azapo and BCM were killed off in favour of the captured ANC which Negotiated at CODESA on behalf of Black people with Ramaphosa as Chief Negotiator.
He delivered for White Apartheid beneficiaries by giving us a pro-White (Sunset Clauses) Canadian Constitution with European values and maintaining the Vestigates of Apartheid and colonial gain such as Land. 
Ramaphosa was awarded for his Double Agent work by being made a Billionaire. 
The ANC was pressured by Business to appoint Ramaphosa as Zuma's Deputy in order to attract business. 
When Zuma did do that; he was suddenly poisoned with the same GEM that killed Yasser Arafat. Zuma was saved by Russian doctors (and MaNtuli was blamed). 
Remember how the Rating Agencies and the Media was worked up to high Anti-Zuma hysteria which all died down when Ramaphosa took over



Homepage:     https://dwahts.blogspot.com


Globalist Coin? Would the Globalists use a cryptocurrency for their One-World-Currency?



Issuing digital Fiat Currency was always going to be the candidate for the famed "Öne-World-Currency" planned by the internationalist central banking "NWO" because typing ones and zeros onto your digital balance sheet by legal mandate was always going to be easier than printing physical money. But digital Fiat Currency is not a Cryptocurrency.  The only thing they have in common is being digital.  The globalist angle here is actually a cashless society to completely control the grid (meaning credit card transactions, payments, foreign exchange and bank accounts)  This way they shut out what used to be known free-market capitalism in the good old days, now known as the informal sector.  Such entrepreneurial enterprises outside of the centralised framework of banking, SWIFT, PAYPAL, and the bankster frameworks of foreign exchange and Visa/Mastercard accepted by all the retail monopolies, usually globalist retail companies by policy rather than ideology even if they are not multinationals because they are still corporate.  Crypro may shut out beggars for now but even though it's digital its decentralised and controlled by the people on a distributed network of peers via a blockchain rather than some standardised SAP system under centralised bankster administration.  This clip will demonstrate how Bitcoin is boosting the informal sector, particularly the dark web and the surprising conclusions.we can now come to.




The other important factor is that real crypto cannot be printed by some shadowy central cabal, by government or by corporations, it has to be mined.  This would collapse the economy where the banksters rely on QE money printing for their means of control, so digital currency and cryptocurrency have even less in common than most people think.

Here are my requirements for real crypto if you are interested.

The establishment oligarchs have taken gold and silver, peoples money, and issued our currency for us.  Their oligarchy establishment will only accept their currency and can turn you off from their grid under centralised control at any moment.  Without cash, you would be utterly lost in that situation.  With crypto, you could at least transact anonymously if you know the means and nobody can "switch you off".

This is the main reason why I will not go full socialist under corporate/govt administration as long as we are on a monetary system, although it does seem likely that some or other form of socialism may be needed for a long time yet for medical, pension, military, prisons and social services to keep the multinational globalist vultures away from the benefits that they are entitled to since it's their tax that funds it. Those that take a simple "pro" or änti" stance on capitalism lack imagination or don't understand that socialism can be used by malicious forces just as capitalist forces do on Wall Street today.  Capitalism is evolving away from the oligarchs to the people by the following means, slowly reintegrating into society":

Capitalism can be for the people or entrepreneurial even today, even though it's moving outside the formal sector, which the globalists would consider "The Establishment."

Examples:


  • Cryptocurrency
  • Street Vendors
  • Some taxi drivers outside of globalist schemes like Uber
  • The black market
  • Smuggling 
  • The Dark Web
  • Stokvels
  • Spazza Shops
  • etc... basically anywhere where they don't take credit cards.


So why would the globalists want Crypto? I doubt it, but there are rumours that if Hashgraph is used instead of blockchain, which solves the Byzantine Generals problem of consensus, is not open source software, the crypto may not be decentralised, especially if they use pre-mined tokens, and all sorts of back-doors could exist for the globalists to move into, copyright or monopolise rather than destroy cryptocurrency.  They are already buying and gaming crypto, but this will never give them the control they need, they just influence the investment value.  Ultimately crypto is increasing in value due to scarcity whereas fiat is inflationary due to expanding the currency supply faster than goods and services, and deficit spending growing faster than GDP.

The fiat currency "One World Currency" would likely be digital, and follow a similar path that the Euro did with the globalist EU single currency zone, it would not be a cryptocurrency.  The IMF already has the prototype, the Special Drawing Right, known as the SDR, currently being made into a currency basket with the USD, Euro, Yuan, Ruble in preparation for phase-in after the IMF forecloses on the Fed, whenever that may be.

That being said, the following developments are interesting:


The above clip gives a thorough synopsis, but here are some contrasting takes from differently aligned sources:

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/05/facebook-cryptocurrency-coming-in-june-report.html

https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2019/06/06/facebook-globalcoin-cryptocurrency/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2019/06/06/facebooks-radical-bitcoin-beating-cryptocurrency-plans-revealed/#45bce3053564

Keep watching that space!

Having a free market of various cryptocurrencies has its benefits,  such as not having central bank monopoly of the money creation process and having them LOAN BACK our money to us as if it were theirs and afford bondholders investment opportunity with the nation's taxation as surety just to enable deficit spending, but there is a caveat.  One of the fundamental points of having a non-inflationary cryptocurrency is precisely because having only a fixed number of Bitcoins or whatever able to be mined, scarcity is ensured, but removing limits on the number of crypto's themselves defeats this purpose because even if the banksters are not creating the actual currency, the system can be gamed, so it will interesting to see how the community deals with this challenge.

New York Times invents fake climate history to match its fake geopolitical history.

Some vintage New York Times propaganda

The New York TImes.  One of Americas trusted names in media.  I certainly trust them, but let me clarify that statement. All their sports scores are accurate, and their telephone number and website address are correct usually,  They have a good spellcheck software option.  Sometimes their page numbers are correct, and their address perhaps. Anything else?"Perhaps their economic indicators are technically accurate, even if they are reported in a completely disingenuous context. Anything else?

Nope, nothing else is correct because they insist on filling their content with "News" and "Politics" and "Climate Change".....

....and let's face it....

They will never get any of that right, so my praise is limited to my opening paragraph which is a testament to nothing more than the staggering misplacement of trust I was referring to in my second sentence.

In the clip below from his YouTube channel, Tony Heller goes back in time and shows us how much hotter summer used to be in the States, but he uses a method that the NYT may not fully understand,  He goes by facts.  He then takes those facts and makes conclusions BASED ON THOSE SAME FACTS!

He could be onto something.  All I know is that if the fact-based reporting on politics, war or climate change ever catches on in the good old USA, all of their MSM is finished.

But let's be serious for a moment here. I am joking around of course, I don't really believe US media will really start reporting facts, not even a flat-earther would believe a wild conspiracy theory like that!

Within 10 years search engines will be so Blue-Pilled as to offer no meaningful information. Here is one way around that scenario.


Following up from:
There is something amiss in cyberspace.  Searches feel like there is a nanny standing by protecting us from the horrors of alternative takes on world affairs, Google, in particular, is absolutely terrified we could at some stage receive news that is not entirely true (where were they during my childhood and National Enquirer or People Magazine stories of alien abductions).  They are so worried that they have assigned all the worst news companies that have lied us into wars, push hopeless nonsense that is quite patently false, and directly lie.... to vet out news sources.  I don't know what colour the sky is in Google land but last time I checked we are not all fucking morons.  Perhaps 30% of us, sure, and another 30% too busy to bother but the rest of us are not so utterly devoid of our faculties of independent and critical thought that we haven't noticed that after 30 years of global warming panic it hasn't gotten any warmer beyond expected trends (in fact cooling seems to be an issue).
We are not so utterly lacking in mental fortitude as to swallow the rubbish that Google cough's up. Are we?

Censorship is everywhere, a natural successor to "Divide and Rule" means that if we decide today that if, leta say gays or minorities, people of colour or women are to be empowered, we come down hard on any descent. 

Problem is we come down once more on those same groups when we later replace them with Transexuals entering female sport (just ask Martina Navratilova) or pot plants running for president or whatever the hell is in vogue.  The main point is that we are getting used to being silenced, and the symptoms are everywhere in the PC search environment and MSM or social media environment online. 
While the Dark Web is stimulating the revival of a near free market-esque vibe using cryptocurrency to mirror the informal vendors and traders so desperately trying to take back entrepreneurial capitalism from large globalist multinationals, it's not enough. (See fascinating talk in clip below)


We have to build our own search framework around the real world. Establishment search engines are profiled by pro-war, political, partisan, climate change propagandist spin and algorithm weighting.  It should be easy to ditch our fetish with some organic gas vital for life, since anyway that is virtue signaling your way to the globalist agenda. Care about the plane? Try getting those behind the AGW movement to stop producing nuclear bombs and millions of tons of plastic waste instead. They are the same people using the same media.   We need to stop listening to media cheering for us to keep spending trillions on wars and bailing out banks and spend one tenth of that eliminating homelessness and give everyone basic healthcare. The socialism vs capitalism debate is actually moot unless you consider that society should be judged on how it treats its warmongers and banksters, rather than it's sick and old.  Those guys who complain they are paying for the poor are full of shit. The poor are paying for them, do you really want these guys deciding your search parameters by some shadowy unknown policy? Even politicians are sick of it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/tulsi-gabbard-google-lawsuit-debate-2020-election-tucker


I put it to you that simply searching for correct information would correct the course, and start us back on the road to... we... something other than completely and utterly batshit clueless.
Start with YaCy.
Rather than simply having you type a query into a search box and enjoying results supplied by the engine, YaCy uses installed software through which anyone can contribute to the results, in a decentralized peer-to-peer, crowd-sourced take on Web search. The program also lets organizations build an internal search for their sites or intranets. Finally, YaCy comes with none of the privacy or censorship concerns of Google or the rest, since it doesn't rely on one large company.


This way the more of us that use it, the better the framework of indexed results begins to organically mould towards information we are ACTUALLY LOOKING FOR.
In fact YaCy is more of a framework for peer-to-peer search services, though a demo "portal" lets the curious try out searching on one of the general Web search implementations, called freeworld. But YaCy's makers stress that just using the service without installing the peer-to-peer service destroys the service's basic concept of decentralization. Users who install its software store a piece of the service's index.


Signup and Setup
YaCy's site claims that installation takes just three minutes, and in my case it actually took less than 2 minutes. Installer software is available for Windows, Mac, and GNU/Linux, each about 20MB in size. Luckily, after this quick installation, you don't have to do your searching in the program; everything is done in the browser, just as with any other search service. But this background operation inevitably drains a bit of your system resources and Internet bandwidth. There is a Performance settings page, where YaCy's priority set set to "below normal" by default, but the interface for throttling down the service's bandwidth usage isn't straightforward.
Interface
A system tray icon is pretty much the extent of the installed program's interface. Double-clicking this opens your default browser to a YaCy Web search box. Along the top of the webpage are tabs for Administration, Web Search, Search Network, Peer Owner Profile, and Help/Wiki. In the tradition of Google, the search interface is barebones: You just get a box under the P2P Web Search title, with the only options at this level being text or images.
A "more options" link lets you tell YaCy how many results to display per page (10, 50, or 100), whether to use the P2P network or just a local index. This page also show some search tricks, like parameters to only show results with a specified phrase in the URL, from a specified site, by a certain author. You can also tell YaCy to sort results by date, nearness of search terms, and language. But doing a lot of this is simpler in Google. Options you won't find in that leader are to include Scroogle results (i.e., Google results scraped clean of ads and cookie tracking) or Blekko results.
If you're fond of using your browser's built-in search, YaCy suggests simply "click-open on the default search engine in the upper right search field of your browser and select Add YaCy Search. This worked fine in Firefox, Chrome, and Opera, but Internet Explorer needs a plugin to be created for its search provider site.
YaCy's Administration tools are where you can choose whether you want to use it for regular Web search with Freeworld, for you own Web pages, or an intranet. You can also change your peer's name and port. To help the search service, you'll need to open a hole in your firewall, which the setup tries to do for you.

Googles new censorship and regime change company / Think Tank


Google is no longer just towing the globalist line, it is actively pushing the establishment narrative on all the flashpoint issues where censorship is required and in all the regions where regime change is required.

Welcome to the Orwellian reality of Google's new hybrid think-tank/ Company JIGSAW.

According to establishment mouthpiece, Wikipedia, the sanitised blurb for Jigsaw is as follows:

Jigsaw
Companyjigsaw.google.com
Jigsaw, formerly Google Ideas, is a technology incubator created by Google, and now operated as a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. Based in New York City, Jigsaw is dedicated to understanding global challenges and applying technological solutions, from "countering extremism", online censorship and cyber-attacks, to protecting access to information.Wikipedia
Formerly called:Google Ideas (2010–2015)
Type:Think tank
Founded:2010
Why not decide for yourself:
https://jigsaw.google.com/
Recommended article:https://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/10/18/jigsaw/

South Africa: Land and Taxes Part 2: Climate Change


Continued from https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/05/south-africa-land-and-taxes-part-1-paper.html

Because I'm so frustrated with the narrative of media coverage in SA, and the entire framing of issues in the minds of South Africans, I'm going to do a whole series of posts on Banks, Mines, The JSE, the bogus reasoning of all our political parties etc. I'll be attempting to completely reframe the way we think about things here in SA.

Blue text is an active link.

The Issue of Climate Change has been shown (even on this blog alone ) to be a globalist construct and product of the dynastic legacy families of capital finance as well as think tanks from globalist and tax-exempt foundations.  The objective is to seize control over sovereign energy policies and to drive up the price of energy commodities used in privatised or parastatal utility companies such as the Eskom price hikes experienced through hikes in the coal price (energy commodities other than the oil price that is, which is linked to the petrodollar faction of the US hegemonic globalist faction blooded through the CFR which is behind the oil wars, regime change, the US Department of State and the Pentagon). The globalist agenda via the UN is to use sustainability to implement the planned austerity (already rolled out in the globalist vipers den of the EU) and particularly the austerity of carbon swaps, carbon taxes and carbon credits in the post-carbon economy which is being marshalled so diligently at the various globalist climate conferences, the Bilderberg meetings and the PR handled by the ever faithful MSM. 

The science is flimsy at best and the data is regularly corrupted to fit the awful predictions made by the woeful models developed and used as evidence (not that models can EVER be called evidence).  Simply put the science does not stand to scrutiny and this has been dealt with many times before in previous posts.  If you do not accept this premise the impact of this particular post will be lost on you but I welcome any constructive engagement through the contact section of this blog or as a private message on Facebook or Twitter. Please focus on the specific point of disagreement to save me the time of repeatedly covering the same issues if I have not covered that issue in enough detail previously to persuade you. I only use a tiny fraction of the collection of reputable data sources, professional sources and media or organisational institutions as referenced links but have dozens more too detailed to use as quick verifications for citations on my posts.  If you make a compelling case I assure you I will reply and cite you in amendments or corrections with thanks if you can clearly demonstrate an error or point out a reasoning flaw.

Usually, the globalist cabal (for lack of a better word to describe this sort of colluding collective) has gotten to our government via the finance ministers post, usually via treasury or the SARB.  The climate change agenda works differently and uses the IPCC as well as the UN as its supra-national enforcer of choice instead of the IMF or World Bank and ICC.  It also has taken the trouble of establishing working committees and departments established in every government.  In South Africa this is notably manifest as The Centre For Environmental Rights which will enforce laws and permit criteria which the Chamber of Commerce and Department of Trade and Industry will duly fall in line with. This will give them extra clout because since CODESA the capital finance "powers that be" only control the economy of SA but the Government are the lowly administrators but can still be a barrier to passing legislation, even when insiders like Rhamaphosa are Pravin Ghordan are in office. This way all legislated enforcing can be done using government agencies that have traditional taxpayer oversight, from the bureaucratic sector to even the police force and the courts, all are now going to have to police this these practices or they will be in the unenviable position of dereliction of duty if they refuse to enforce.  We missed the boat by stopping this at the source, prior to legislation being passed. 



Rhamaphosa's latest cabinet features too many politicians from the post Zuma cabinet that are loyal to Rhamaphosa and possibly therefore his masters from the JSE or offshore to be sure about who will put the country first VS who will do us damage by following rich heritage of globalist traitors such as Tito Mbowemi, Trevor Manual and Pravin Ghordan but even if they don't the damage is already done.


THE BAD NEWS.
This is going to cost us big time. Aside from price hikes in sectors such as energy, we are facing at minimum another 1.6 Trillion USD or 109 Trillion ZAR by conservative estimates over the next thirty years. .  This involves a comprehensive restructuring of our already manipulated economy by 2050. Moreover, we are looking at a vast fortune when you consider that the entirety of our national budget for public spending MTEF 2/2020 from 2/2019 this year was only 5.9 Trillion.

The climate change agenda is currently the second biggest globalist goal right now, second only to regime change wars associated with the protection of the Petrodollar system but more important even than the censorship purge on social and dinosaur media as well as propaganda wars because is an internationalist roll out transcending the regional local challenges of one economic zone (or as we peasants say - one "nation" or "country" ;) )

I do consider some reforms to be very healthy, but those causing the main economic reforms are all centered around emissions.


  Primary Legislation

National Environmental Management Act
National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act
National Environmental Management: Waste Act
National Forests Act
National Water Act
Environment Conservation Act

Other
Minimum emission standards were published in Government Notice No. 248 in 2010

Continued at https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/06/south-africa-land-and-taxes-part-3-from.html

South Africa: Land and Taxes Part 1: Paper

Image in the public domain covered by "Fair Use" https://support.google.com/legal/answer/4558992?hl=en&ref_topic=4558877
Because I'm so frustrated with the narrative of media coverage in SA, and the entire framing of issues in the minds of South Africans, I'm going to do a whole series of posts on Banks, Mines, The JSE, the bogus reasoning of all our political parties etc. I'll be attempting to completely reframe the way we think about things here in SA.

Blue text is an active link.

Paper needs LAND and Paper products form an interesting discussion around tax. Most of SA's tax is from VAT, formerly GST as well as feul tax and levies as well as income tax.


1. VAT on textbooks is a form of capital generation by the government, although a book itself is a finished product, large capital flow goes into the beneficiation of paper from timber.
2. Paper is obviously still made from wood, JSE listed companies Sappi and Mondi Rotatrim, Typek all need vast tractions of land or deals with farmers or other related timber companies which often leads to deforestation (destroying the ecological base of South African fauna with plantations and monoculture)
3. Some of these companies lie and say they use coated, woodfree paper, whatever that means. It is a lie.
4. Universities and schools are amongst the largest consumers of paper and pulp products everywhere, possibly the biggest of them all.  This ranges from books to textbooks, cardboard, pulp, toilet tissue etc. Brands like Twinsaver, Kleenex, Baby Soft are all branches of the large conglomerates involved in the paper and pulp making industry, which all use wood found on LAND as a raw material.
USA, Great Britain, Canada, Sweden, Finland, Russia, Korea, China are amongst the scavengers of African forests for the paper and pulp industry.
A very good case was recently made against VAT in textbooks, considering the above this is nowhere near enough! The issue should be further unpacked to look at plantation ownership rather than just "employment opportunities" offered since plantations take up over 1% of our total land, which is massive when you consider how much Karoo and highveld wilderness remains unused or undeveloped or protected.
 In terms  of  land  use,  the  afforested  area is about 1,27 million ha or about 1% of the total South African land area  of  122,3  million ha.

This opens a Pandora's box which I will get to in future posts.I have many reservations that any meaningful land reform will ever come from purely race-based politics which feed the divide and rule agenda, even though most of the land historically recently has been in "white" hands, by perpetuating the above nothing will change except some blacks will be empowered. However, this only applies if your idea of empowerment is the rich black CEO's, upper management and shareholders that South Africas "Employment Equity" laws guaranteed placement. This especially applies to these multinational companies and equally corrupt sub-contractors and vendors.  In real-world terms, no opportunity exists on the land of the forefathers of the black majority for their descendants even years after the colonial rule was supposedly ended.  Racial employment laws and other factors also are sending "previously advantaged" whites packing if the emigration stats are anything to go by.

Racial issues exist as inextricably linked to land issues in South Africa but the local approach to them, just like everywhere in the world is divide and conquer/ divide and rule. 
If history teaches us anything (real history not fake history)  is that we should not support top-down initiatives masking such tactics unless you are a ruling elite who would then benefit. Are you a ruler? Will you benefit?

These multinationals own much of the land their plantations are on, rather than "White farmers" we are dealing with clever shareholder arrangments, JSE arrangments and political bureaucracy that leads to all the usual suspects.

https://www.sappi.com/sappi-forests

https://ejatlas.org/conflict/mondi-and-sappi-plantations-in-zululand-south-africa

https://fulldisclosure.cer.org.za/2015/paper-pulp/licences

The issue is not just land but the paper itself and this extends to education. 
1. SA Reserve Bank has a duty to regulate rates which determine prices at which goods are sold.
2. SARS has a duty to collect revenue from these monstrous Multi-National companies which manufacture paper. But how many billions does Sappi have offshore? which if were progressively taxed would fund the education of thousands of students?

3. The National Treasury, Finance Minister and SARS also have a duty in making sure that all textbook selling stores in South Africa don't engage in price fixing or hike the price due to opportunistic political development.

After all, why should the students pay so much money while Multi-National companies, especially those profiting off our land, are allowed to shift profit to offshore havens without them declaring profits?
If anyone wants their land back or at least reasonably priced back in the public domain for entrepreneurs and taxpayers rather than rebate thieving offshore multinationals, start with the paper industry and follow the path to free government education.  


Paper leads to business and education... but also to land and taxation.  This is how to frame the issue in your mind. Now, what if I told you every other industry follows a similar path?  Don't believe me? Stay tuned for upcoming posts on SA Land & Taxes for more of this 

 As a side note on the education thread that I'd like to tie up, It is critical that the core syllabus never be handled in privatised capacity. This should always be a taxpayer-funded function that must be improved from that sphere rather than privatising. The reasons for this are clear and abandoning expectation for government improvements and allowing faceless, shadowy corporate agendas to steer the ship can only end in tears. 

Continued at:    https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/06/south-africa-land-and-taxes-part-2.html

Homepage: https://dwahts.blogspot.com

The Feds Tragic Plan for long term rates


When I wrote this post: https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/12/american-people-buy-stuff-they-dont.html
I realise I left out some important information essential to a bigger understanding of how the manipulated economy works, which is of course much different to how it will be explained on Bloomberg, CNN / BBC Money /Biz or MSNBC. I focussed on exporting inflation but I entirely forgot to understand bubbles in the context of also being inflation.  This is critical.  It also supplements my post: https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/04/money-printing-for-dummies.html
Perfectly and would suggest reading both those posts before listening to the brilliant Mike Maloney in the following video which you must listen to in its entirety.  I learn a lot from this man.



Other Posts I have done where I use Mike Maloney's input are as follows:

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/11/empires-only-collapse-for-one-reason.html

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/04/economic-realities-geopolitical-stage.html

Evil Inc: Worlds Top 5 Evil Corporations.

This is lifted straight from an RT article because I liked their choice and rationale so much.

World’s top 5 ‘most evil’ corporations

World’s top 5 ‘most evil’ corporations
Most companies become successful thanks to their stellar reputations. But not always. RT Business scraped the bottom of the barrel to find the most hated companies trending on the internet.


Monsanto

The company that needs no introduction, creator of DDT and Agent Orange, Monsanto is one the world’s largest pesticide and GMO seed manufacturers. It is known for being the first company to genetically modify a seed to make it resistant to pesticides and herbicides. Monsanto’s herbicides have been blamed for killing millions of crop acres, while its chemicals were added to blacklists of products causing cancer and many other health problems.

Apple

Once the darling of Microsoft-hating gadget lovers, Apple more recently has been accused of mistreating or underpaying their employees, hiding money offshore, and not paying taxes. It has also been accused of violating health or environmental legislation, and misusing its position where they have a monopoly in the market. And, oh yes, deliberately slowing older iPhones and overcharging for its products to boot.

Nestle

The world's largest food and beverage company Nestle says it is committed to enhancing quality of life and contributing to a healthier future. However, it has been dragged through numerous scandals involving slave labor. The multinational is one of the most boycotted corporations in the world, as violations of labor rights have been reported at its factories in different countries.

Philip Morris

The products of the American multinational cigarette and tobacco manufacturing company are sold in over 180 countries outside the United States. Philip Morris owns Marlboro, one of the world's biggest brands. Back in 1999, Philip Morris courted officials of the Czech Republic by explaining how smoking would in fact help their economy, due to the reduced healthcare costs from its citizens dying early.

McDonald's

American fast-food company McDonald's was founded in 1940. The company serves more customers each day than the entire population of Great Britain, but has a long history of terrible labor practices. It has been constantly under fire for serving unhealthy junk food, which contributes health problems. Researchers have found that McDonald’s burgers cannot decompose on their own.
Notable mentions of corporations not quite evil enough to make the top list:

Goldman Sachs
JPMorgan Chase
ExxonMobil
Halliburton
British American Tobacco
Dow Chemical
DuPont
Bayer
Microsoft
Google
Facebook
Amazon
Walmart
Here is the original article on RT:

For more stories on economy & finance visit RT's business section

Labels

Search This Blog

Your Feedback

Name

Email *

Message *