Skip to main content

Olympic Fail!

Personally as a former competitive swimmer I didn't really care about competitors taking drugs that don't really boost performance (they are in abundance and increasing on the petty "banned lists" yearly) and I don't get why drugs like alcohol and weed are banned for "not being in the spirit of sport"  I've seen many an athletes career ruined for what appears to me to be a risk not worth the reward and therefore a likely mistake.  It's almost like the ruling bodies want so many chemicals on the banned lists that when they need it, they have something on everyone. The only thing I care about is that the same standards are applied to everyone.

Michael Phelps has had his fair share of strife with substances, but in the end he carried on to be the most decorated Olympian in history.  His famous bong incidents and his DUI conviction seem relatively tame compared to Justin Gatlin and Tyson Gays bans for taking performance enhancing drugs, but at the end of the day all of them, and many more from the West are still free to compete, enjoy the glory and win medals for their nations.

Fast forward to today when we have hundreds of clean Russian athletes banned, not on positive dope tests like the above, but on the word of a "whistle-blower" Guilty until proven innocent. As crazy as it seems this is whats happening, and it's disgusting. Perhaps that's why these Olympics seem a bit of a let down.  Add it to the massive protests Brazilians are making due to having their president ousted and a US bankster stooge usurp her, perhaps it's the blanket ban that the Russian Track & Field team had to endure, who knows....

To think that only Russia has a doping problem is naive, and other nations who's system is also to blame and not the athletes have seen ONLY THE GUILTY PUNISHED!

Why was the entire Kenyan team not banned? How come only the guilty officials were punished unlike in Russia?

The whole thing stinks if you ask me.

Athletes who are greats in their sport, athletes who have been clean their entire careers cannot compete just because they are Russian, whereas American known cheats compete to the cheers of the world.  This is not right and we need to make talking about this clear politicizing of sport normal. Shame on everyone who has not called BS on this one!

It's the hypocrisy that gets me.  All the brainwashed zombies who watch MSM happily show no outrage, NONE of the commentators has brought up how disgusting the decision is and some of them even believe it's a fair deal, these are people who clearly do not posses the ability for clear and rational thought.  It shows us how much of the faculty of independent thought we have given up in the West.

But that's not the last of it, just when everything seemed totally weird, they decide ban the entire Russian Paralympic team too!

Popular posts from this blog

Dīvide et imperā: How To Defeat The Most Effective Social Control Weapon In Human History

Many different empires, cultures and nations have existed in history and while the details, styles, values and aesthetics keep changing, the core structure remains unchanged. In order to benefit from social coperation and steal reward in excess of the labour and value you invest, you cannot take it by brute  for extended periods of time without facing the wrath of the crowds. The crowds need to give it to you willingly or unknowingly. There was one exception to this synopsis, the Feudal System  but there is more to that than people realise, it's a post for a later day and deserves full scrutiny and parrellels do manifest. The support of the home crowd is also needed to win wars. No army has ever been effective fighting under duress, they would assemble, arm  and immediatly turn on you.

Before the current reigning Judeo-Christian Anglo American Empire of today there were other more monolithic empires that the loosely ideologically aligned old money banking dynasties, globalists an…

Scientific Consensus is that Consensus is overturned 100% of the time

Everything you know is wrong. There is a very good reason why science succeeds more often than politics does.  Unlike politics, It's not a consensus or a vote,  it's actually method.  The scientific method. Anyone who has read this blog before probably knows I'm a lifelong science junkie as well as someone who spends thousands of hours breaking down the the political and economic agendas behind the special interest groups that guide public policy.  In many ways I'm actually uniquely qualified to tie these angles together in ways not well understood by the overwhelming majority of people.  That actually includes scientists. Scientists are notoriously naive in the political and economic forces that drive the human world.

For example if you are of the opinion that the earth has one moon, the earth revolves around the sun etc you are already wrong. Well sort of. The politicpl world is black and white, the scientific world is nuanced, see…

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!

Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.

I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.

Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as…